My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1021-15
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Resolutions
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
1021-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2019 3:50:44 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:41:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Planning Commission
DOC TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution 1021-15 <br />Page 2 <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing <br />regarding this request on March 18, 2015; and, <br />WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of <br />which alI must be satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission <br />finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with <br />regard to the property located at 2704 County Road 10, and makes the following <br />findings of fact related to its decision: <br />1. The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding signage limits is for aesthetic <br />reasons. The requested additional signage still meets the general purpose and <br />intent of the zoning code. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is <br />trying to keep the business successful. <br />3. The applicant is requesting this variance because the building now has additional <br />tenants who need their business information on the sign. <br />4. The unique feature of this property is the style of the building as it looks like a <br />house rather than an office building and signage is very important to direct new <br />and existing customers to the building. <br />5. The additional sign height will not alter the existing commercial character of the <br />neighborhood. <br />6. The variance requested is the minimum variance the applicant feels is required to <br />provide the suitable amount of signage and alleviate the applicanYs practical <br />difficulty. <br />7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be <br />necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such <br />variance upon other properties in the neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.