My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1034-15
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Resolutions
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
1034-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2019 3:50:44 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:41:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Planning Commission
DOC TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
��s�ic������ �c:m���4... �� <br />��c��� � <br />WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria that <br />must be satisfied in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning <br />Commission hereby makes the following findings related to this request: <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning <br />Commission finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the <br />Mounds View Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical <br />difficulty with regard to the property located at 5107 Greenwood Drive, and makes the <br />following findings of fact related to its decision: <br />1. The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding limited fence heights in front <br />yards is to not close off the front of the property from the visual openness of the <br />street, but yet still allow a fence for safety and some sense of privacy for the <br />property owners. This becomes difficult is on corner lots, particularly lots that <br />front a busy street, where the property owners really want the privacy due to the <br />high traffic along one of their front yards. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is <br />improving the property. <br />3. The applicant is requesting this variance because the front yard height limitations <br />would preclude having a fence tall enough to provide security, screening and <br />buffering from busy Woodcrest Drive. <br />4. The unique feature of this property is that it is a corner lot which creates two front <br />yards, and the house was built close to the north side of the lot so the south front <br />yard is large. <br />5. There are other properties in the neighborhood that have a 6-foot tall fence in the <br />front yard and have not changed the existing neighborhood character or caused <br />visibility problems for traffic. <br />6. The 2-foot variance is the minimum variance required to alleviate the applicant's <br />practical difficulty since the Zoning Code limits front yard fence heights to four <br />feet. <br />7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be <br />necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such <br />variance upon other proper�ies in the neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.