Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution 1059-16 <br />October 19, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br />WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Code, Section 1125.02, Subd 6 permits the <br />Community Development Director (City Administrator) to approve an Administrative Variance <br />if the subject property is zoned R-1 or R-2; and the variance is within 25% of the required <br />setback, and not less than 5' from a property line; and, <br />WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R-1, and the proposed 5' setback <br />encroachment is 11% of the minimum 45' front yard setback; and, <br />WHEREAS, in accordance with the City of Mounds View City Code, Section 1125.02, <br />Subd 6(b), the Community Development Director has reviewed the variance request, and finds <br />that it is consistent with the variance criteria listed in the City Code Section 1125.02, Subd 2: <br />a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City Code. <br />b. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan: <br />Goal 2: Maintain and upgrade the existing housing stock of the City <br />Policies: b. Use housing projects to promote economic development and tax <br />base expansion. <br />Goal 4: Encourage residential infill and redevelopment that supports the City's <br />housing goals and maintains residential character. <br />C. The applicant's proposed covered front stoop is a reasonable use of the property, <br />not permitted by the City Code because of the front yard setback encroachment. <br />d. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties <br />in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other <br />circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this <br />Title has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions <br />of the applicant. The home was built in 1962, and is set back closer to the street <br />than other homes on the same side of the block. If other homes had been built at <br />the minimum required 30' front yard setback, the greater 45' setback would not <br />be applicable, and a variance for the covered stoop would not be necessary. <br />e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The <br />addition of the covered front stoop onto the home will enhance the character of <br />the home, and the neighborhood. <br />f. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the <br />practical difficulty. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical <br />difficulties. The 5' X 5' covered front stoop is not excessively large. <br />