My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
tterr� N�: 6 <br />6VIee�6ng �a�e: April 2, 2�03 <br />T°ype �f �usiness: Comrnissian Business <br />I " ,I 1 ' ^ -%, w° <br />Toa Chair Stevenson and Planning Commissioners <br />����o James Ericson, Ir�terim City Adminisfrator <br />[tetr� �'it6elSu�Oje�fa Further Discussion and Reconsideraiion of the "No F'�rking" <br />Request on Greei,field Aver�ue South of County Road i <br />i ... •.. <br />On iVlarch 24, 2003, the City Cvuncil held a pubGc hearing to consider �he request to past the easf <br />side of Greenfield Avenue 350 feet 5outh of Counfiy Road I"�!o Parking" Monday through Saturday, <br />8 am to 6 pm. Commissioners Jahnson and Zwirn attended the meefing as did properiy owner <br />S�eve Farrell and a tenant at the praperfy, Ted Rose. fVlr. Rose operaies the Stafie Farm Insurance <br />Agency in the building. <br />� . <br />After takir�g festimony, ihe Councif ackrtowledged that a parking prob[em existed in the area and was <br />cancerned tha� i1�r. Farrell's clients and employees were parking on the street causing an <br />inconvenience for the property owners south on Greenfield Rvenue. The Council discussed wi#h <br />sfaff and fihe property owner various alternatives that cauld be �mployed to resolve fihe sifuafiion <br />j wi�hout imposing parking restrictions. <br />,-, <br />The Co�tncil asked Mr. Farrell if he woufd be willing fo expand his parking lot, fo which Mr. Farrell <br />responded in the affirmative; and the Council also discussed the pQSSibilify of allowing parking on <br />Greenfield direetly across from the building, but not any further south until beyond the 350-foot <br />location. Allowing parking on Greenfie[d across trom the business would leave two or fhree sialls <br />and if the parking lof were expanded by two stails, that could potentially resoive the parking situatio�. <br />While that may be true, the Counci! was told the Commissian had a(ready discussed the parking lot <br />expansion issue at length and was concerr�ed thafi any furfher expansion of ihe lot would be an <br />aesfhetic detriment to the neighbarhflod. The Council also suggested exploring the possibility of <br />striping for narrower parking stalls (i.e., 8"/z feefi in widfh instead of the required 9 feet) and whefher <br />that would cjenerafe mare stalls. <br />After considering ai[ of fihe fesfiimony and information presented, the City Council tabled acfian on the <br />requesf, �ending the issue back to the Pfanning Commission for addifionai review and consideration. <br />. .:. .: <br />Reconsider �he parking situafion and dimensiona� requirements and defiermi�e if there is a need <br />to amend fihe Commission's Resolution 71�-03 recommending IVo Parking on Greenfield Ave. <br />�Q��; "��-�� <br />� Jarr�es Ericson <br />Infierim City Clerk/Administrafor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.