My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Greenfield Ave Report <br />Jan 22, 2003 <br />��_ Page 2 <br />The drawbacks of such an expansion are two-fold. From an aesthetic perspective, ane could <br />argue that the reduction of green-space and the encroachment of the parking lot toward <br />Greenfield would amount to a degradation of the physical appearance of this site. (I was not able <br />to manipulate photos to show what an expanded parking 1ot mighi look 1ike.) The other <br />drawback regarding �his potential expansion is that ihe City would be deviating from its rules to <br />grant a further expansion of the variance. The property owner caused the hardship in that he <br />bought the property lcnowing full well the parking limitations. <br />Idecornrr�endutaon: <br />The Pianning Commission needs to first determine if the on-street parking problez�ns z-ise to the <br />level whereby posting the street `No Parking" would be appropriate. Second, assuming that <br />overflow parking will occur regardless, the Planning Commission needs to deternline if an <br />expansion of the parking lot would be warranted, given ihe above considerations. �1Vhile an <br />expansion has been shown to be physically possible, that does not mean it's appropriate. <br />The Planning Gommission must address, weigh and balance the various interests of the residential <br />property owners, the multiple-family residents and owners, the business owner (Mr. Farrell) and <br />the safety of the generat public using the street. Keep in mind that a recommendation to past the <br />street or portion �hereof as "No Parking" is just that—a recommendation. The City Council <br />"'�y makes the final determination. If reducing ihe number of vehicles parked on the street is the <br />`' ultimafe goal, then considering a variance to expand the parking lot would be one way to <br />accomplish this; however staff would recommend that any variance be applied far by t�e property <br />owner through the normal process—it should not be initiated by the Planning Commission. <br />Given all thai, the Pianning Commission may choose to act on the attached resolution, Resolution <br />71 �-03, recommending posting the east side of Greenfield Avenue north of the apartment <br />complex driveway as "No Parking from Here to Corner." <br />� Gt,vN.Q.d ��.�.cli-B�t+�, <br />James Ericson <br />Community Deveiopment Director <br />Attachments: <br />1. Resolution 718-03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.