2003 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

I�em i�o: 06 �6ieeti�g Da�e: April 16, 2003 Type o�f �usirt�s�; Commission �usiness / : /.. ..i:: � . :.�: , i io: Maunds View Planning Commission Frorn: James Ericson, Acting City Administrator [tern TitielSubjec�: Review Proposed PUD Amendment Regarding the Property Located at 2442 County Highway 'f 0 . �: . � On May 19 , 1998, the Mounds View City Counci[ approved Resolution 5226, a resolution farmally approving a Planned Unifi Developme��t (PUD) agreement for a theater develapmenf on a parcel bounded by County Road H2 to ihe �outh, Long Lake Road to the west and Highway 10 (now County Highway i0} to fihe narth. The PUD agreement esfabiished uses for the site which were as follows: � Multi-screen movie theater � Office uses • Parking � Restauranis � Retail :�� The PUD agreement was specific as to which us�s would be focated on which iots. Since its approval, four of ihe seven parcels have been develo�ed: The theafer, the parking lot (which is its own lot since it is separated f�rm the theafier by Edgewood Drive right of way) and an office building. Recenfily, Jake's of Mounds View entered into a purchase agreement with the developer to improve the second of the #hree office lots for additional parking to serve Jake's. (The remaining office parcel is aEso being considered for addi#ional parking by Carmike Cinemas.} The only twa remaining undeveloped lots then are identified by the developer as Outparcel "A" and Outparcel "B". Outparcel B is the undeveloped !ofi next to the theater which was pfanned for use as a restaurani or retail, or a combinaiion ofi the bofih. OutparceE A, ihe parcel within the PUD currentfy being considered for amer�dment, was originally established for a restaurant use. Since the theaier opened, the developer's representatives have marketed the site to pa#ential restaurafeurs and franchise groups, however they have not succeeded in securing an appropriafie restaurant tenant, which has prompted them to consider alternative uses and, this PUD amendrnent. In addition to tF►e restaurant use, the developer would like to add "office" as a permitted use far the parcel. � . An amendment #o a Planned Unit Developments is processed as would an amendment to an approved Cor�difiional Use Permit, which is to say that the procedural requirements of Section 1125 of fihe Zoning Cade would be followed. Section 1125 requires �hat the Pianning Commission review the request, taking into consideration any and all potentiaf - adverse effects of the proposed ar�nendment.