Laserfiche WebLink
I�1o�ncIs V�ew �i�r�ning C'o�nmi�s�os� <br />12e�ular Ii�Iee�itxg <br />Ap�°il �, 2003 <br />P�ge 2 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Zwirn/Hegland. To Approve the Planning Cammission Minutes for <br />February i 9, 2003, and March 5, 2003 as Pres�nted. <br />� <br />None. <br />� <br />Ayes — 7 Nays — 0 Mation carried. <br />Citize�� kt.�qa�esgs and Co�r►ene�ts on Ite�n� I�Iot an <br />Public I�ea�°i�g a�ad Cot�side�°at�an flf a Reques# <br />I2oad <br />Community Development Director Ericson provided an explanation of tr <br />the variance request indicating that the City had made an error when it isi <br />and naw ihe sti-ucture is 11 feet into tlae "prevailing" setback. I He further <br />struct�.�xe is made of concrete and there would be`a large cost.associated � <br />concrete and moving the structure back the 11. feet to meet the setbacic re <br />at 7741 I�ong <br />surrounding <br />uilding permit <br />E that the <br />✓ing the <br />D'zrector Ericson indicated he had gone th�i�ough the seven required hardship criteria in l�is Staff <br />report and commented that it could be argued that tliere is a hardship not caused by the developer <br />in this situation. He then said that granfing this variar�ce would mean that the Commission i <br />wouid also need to address the total square footage of the garage and shed, which together '� <br />exceed the zxxaximum of 1800: sauare feet. <br />Director Eiicson indi <br />additional :setbacl� �re� <br />have been a problern <br />does feel badly aboul <br />Commissiorier Johns <br />over ,the 1800 square <br />Dii'ector Ericson iz�di <br />ed that Staft'feels badlytnat this error occurred and said tliat if the <br />rement had heen caught the developer has indica#ed that it would not <br />niove the entire structure back the 11 feet. He then said that while Staff <br />e incident, he is not sure if staf�s error along justifies a variance. <br />many variances have been granted for accessory structures <br />the City has not granted any variances for over the 1800 square <br />Director Ericson commented that he does not see an issue with a conditional use permit request <br />for an o�versize garage but does see an issue with approving a variance for 2000 square feet <br />' versiis the 1800 square feei allowed by the City's Code. He then commented that the City, in <br />esse�ce, approved the size when the building permit was approved and said that if this variance <br />is approved the Commission would need to seriously consider approving the other variance <br />requesi. <br />Commissioner Joluison aslced where t11e shed is located. <br />� <br />