2003 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

10/Ioa�nds `Vie�r Pianr�ing C'o�missiora �2eg�l�r Ii�Ieeting A�ral 2, 200� Page 9 Commissioner Hegland asked why the Commission would do this. He then said that Mr. Fazxell has not offered any alternative parlcing solution for off site parking as asked by the Commission and he does not want to cl�ange the recommendation_ Coin�nissioner Scotch agreed. Con�unissioner Jahnson agreed and said that commons : parlcing was not adequate for Mr. Farrell's plans far the Commissioner Zwirn indicaied he had spoken at the Cou that Council IVlembers had not done their homework and asked if Mr. Farrell intended to come to this meeting to c Director Ericson indicated he was notified of the meeting There was consent among Commission Mem post Greenfield Avenue no parking. 7o Consicieratio� of a I)eve�i 2�65 Cou�ty �i�h�ay 10 Community Developn�ent Di Comn�ission indicating that a depth of the lat it is unlilcely � the expansian would give the the applicant intends to dress MOTION/SECQND Miller� County, Highway 1 �. J vvas �o have di said he was shocked '` �ut the issues. He fhen to the �usine�s �,ocated at >n explained the development request for tl�e foot addition 'is sought. He then said that given the hboring'properties wouid even notice the expansion and iditional work space inside. He further commented that of the garage with a hricic treatment. ►rove Resoluiion 721-03, a Resolution Review ta Expand the Business Located at 2865 Nays — 0 frorr� voting on this matter. Motion carried. c��s an� 12evie� off Pr°oposed Code Amendments �o I�e�u�afe the �itnn� and ensnre of Pawn �I�ops rn IVlounds Vie� _ Community Development Director Ericson indicated that Staff had done a lot of research into the pawnshop o�dinance and then reviewed the proposed changes with tile Commission. He ihen indicated the police departmerzt had reviewed the ordinance and made several recommendations. They are concerned that the fees charged will not actually cover the cost of Staff time.