Laserfiche WebLink
Ii�Io��ds V�ew Planning Cornmission 3anuary S9 2003 <br />Regula� I�Ceeting Page 4 <br />Cominissioner Zwirn indicated he had noi said much during the discussions because he has other <br />issues with Mr. Fa�-reli. He then said that Mr. Farrell has a lot of floweiy thi�lgs to say about <br />worl�ing with the City but he has found that not to be true. He further commented that there are <br />other issues such as the building not being maultained and those issues are not addressed though <br />ihe property owner malces representations that he will resolve t11e issues. <br />Comrx�issioner rohnson indicated that is why he wants the development agreemeni and resolution <br />for no parking if the add'ztional spots do iiat work. <br />Comn�issioner Zwirn indicated tlie State Farm office has two vehicles, the title company utilizes ' <br />two or three spots and the property owner drives separately frorii his r�ife using two stalls and his <br />business has sixteen e��iployees. He then said that parlcing on the street is detrimental to hiin <br />erltering and exiting his driveway duriz�g the day as traffic flow has to stop because two cars <br />caxznot gei through if there are vel�icles parked on the east side of Greenfield. He furtlier <br />indicated that the neighbor to the south has issues getting in and out o�the driveway as well, <br />Coznmissioner Miller asked if any of the traffic cauld be attributed to the apartments, <br />Commissioner Zwirn indicated that the vast majority of the` <br />business property. He then said that rarely oi1 weekends the <br />but the police usually tag the vehicles <br />Comrnissioner Hegland said he <br />limiting the number of employe <br />solutions from the <br />Director Ericson::c <br />farced to be rnore '° <br />Coznmissioner'�oY <br />before Counczl:foi <br />of situation would <br />their <br />lled <br />; other <br />any or <br />les are,people going into the <br />� vehicles that parlc on the s�reet <br />'weekends. <br />`;1 <br />xzs to the siivation such as _ <br />and he has not heard any other <br />eliminated, the property owner would be <br />a solution. <br />years business owners were required to come <br />and, if that practice were still in effect, this type <br />I�ext Planning Commission l►/.[eeting: ,Tanuary 22, 2403 <br />8.; AdjQUrt�rnei <br />Tliere being no furth <br />meeting at '7`22 p.m. <br />to Agencl� Sessio�a <br />business before the Plaru�ing Cominission, Cha.ir Stevenson adjourned the <br />(The n�eeting immediately adjaurned to the Agenda Session) <br />Respectfiilly submitted, ° �' <br />