My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� 35o Fram what you knnw, do you �pprov� Sl`RONGLY APPRaVEoo.mo0l5% <br />} or disapprove of th� job the Mayor �OMEWHAi APPROVEaammeaS4°J. <br />and City Council are doing7 (WAIT SQ��WHAT DTSAPPROV�.ao�5% <br />J �OR RESPONSE3 And do you feei STRO��LY �ISAPPROVEo...3% <br />� strongly that way? DON'i KNDW/REFUSED.oe.�4% <br />� <br />��a Have you or any members o� this YE�000e,a0000.oaa,....33% <br />hpusehoid had coniact with the NO.aa..aao.o.00.a.o.00�8% <br />Mound� View City staff during DQN'� KNOW/REFUSEDao.o.9% <br />the past year? <br />3io From wha� you have seen Dr heards EXCELLENT.o.o.�0eo.000.B% <br />haw would you r�te the �ob per— GDOD.00...o...�.�.e..e54% <br />formance of the Mounds View City �NLY FAIR.oave.00.00.oe9% <br />sta�f °� excellen�, gaods only POORm...m.o...oeoo�.o003`/. <br />�airs or poor? DDNaT KNOW/REFUSEDsoes22l <br />� 3�, Do ydu ��ei that the amount of T00 LIT7L�oe....e.o...15% <br />palice patrolling in y�u� neigh— RBOUT RIGHToa..a�.,.amBO% <br />borhood is too little� abou� T�� MUCMo.oeso.omeaso.o4% <br />� righta or �oo much? DO�'T KNOW/REFUSED.aa..!% <br />r <br />,� <br />I� "i00 LI�7LE" IN QUESTIDN #389 ASKa <br />,�� �90 Wauld you favor or �ppos� �AVQF3e,,.e,ao.,e,o...ao9% <br />�h� hiring ofi more palice OPi'�SEooa..oa�oeaaooaoo5% <br />� a�'�fiCers to expand patrols, DDRi'T' KN�W/RE�tJSEDo . a a.2% <br />even if �t meant an in° <br />' crease in property taxes? <br />J Let's ta3.k about economic development in Mounds View,000 ' <br />s <br />4ao I�f the Cf�y were to attract more developmen�, what kind <br />� would yau prefer it �o be? <br />t�ON'T }4N06J: 17°le SHOF'S: 13% R�SIl�ENTIRL: 18% OFFIG�: 13'/e <br />� INDiJSTRiAL; 26% NONEo 3% FtECREATIONA�o �'i, aTHERa 3'/ <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />42a Do yau feei that the pace of TOO RAPil�oa000000..000F2% <br />commerc3al and industrial devei— ABOiJi RZGHis000a.0000.65% <br />�pment in the city has been too NOT �AST EN�UGH.a000..20% <br />rapid, about raght, or not fast DON'i KfVOW/REFUSEDn.ao.4% <br />enough? <br />�r�e Are th�re any d'al�pidated ar su�—standard areas o-� th� city <br />in which you would par�icularly fave�r r°e—d�veaopmer��? (i� <br />"Y��a" ASK„) What are they? <br />DDN'i KNOWe 10°!, NONEe 7�% TRAILERS; �% At�TSo 2% CO Ie �% <br />Hl�JY. lOc 1% NOUSE io Z% MI,Co ARE4�Sa �% lVOI�iH AREAo 2% <br />� <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.