My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item # 5 <br />�.11� O, f �OZdBZC�S �Z2W <br />� 1 � 1 <br />hleetin� Date: Febyuary 5, 2003 <br />, <br />,; ,c � ; � . r. : <br />� .� ,: , . , ; /> ;` i '` f :- . ,_ i � ; � � , _ _ <br />, ; : �. : � , : �: �, ,- �: •: :�. : :/; <br />;, ,, ., <br />At the Planning Commission's meeting on January 22, 2003, the Commission continued �heir <br />discussian of the parking situation on Greenfield Avenue in response to the overflow parking <br />generated by the business(es) located at 2402 County Ro�d I. The properiy owner had indicated <br />a willin�ness to expand his parking loi by four stalls, hovvever this would require a variauce <br />a.mendment and the execution af a limited use a�eement between the property o�mer and ihe <br />City. The Commission was provided with a resolution to resirict parking on the east side of <br />Greenfieid Avenue from the corner of Greenfield and Cour�ty Raad I to the northernmost <br />driveway of the apartment �omplex, hov✓ever �he Commission did not feel the paxking restriction <br />vvould resolve anything and staff was directed to bring back to the Commission additional <br />f: '� <br />information pertaining to distances from the corner and potential impacts to prope�°ties fu�ther <br />SOUt�I O�triB COTrieT. <br />�ISCILSSlO�'1: <br />Staff inspected the area and took measurements relative to the distances from the corner of <br />Greenfield Avenue and County Road I. The first measurement was to the location of the first <br />proposed "No parking from I�ere to Corner" sign, just north of the northernmost driveway access <br />to the apartment compiex. The second measurement was a 300-foot setback, then a 354-foot <br />setback, and lasYs a 500-faot setback. These locations are rnarked respectiveiy on the attached <br />map as locations A, �, C and D, <br />Based on the discussion from the las� meeting, the Commission has already indicated thai <br />Location A, about 150 feet from the corner, was unacceptable. Location B, at 30a feet from the <br />comer, is situated across the street from the 7556 Greenfield Avenue, north af its driveway by <br />perhaps 30 %et. There are no obstructions on the east side df Greenfeid at this spo�. Location <br />C, 350 feet from the carner, is located almost directly acr�ss from the property line be�vveen 7656 <br />and 7644 Greenfield. While there are no obstructions on ihe east side of Greenfield at this point, <br />the driveway for'i656 Greenfield is at the south end of the lot and vehicles parked on the streei <br />could be an obstruction for resider�ts backing out of the driaeway onto Greenfieid. I,ocation D, <br />intended to represent a 500-foot setbacl� fr�m the corner, is actually about 515 feet due 9:o a <br />dxiveway serving Greenfield Esiateso <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.