My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
detrimental fo the intent of the zoning code and would potentially adversely impact the <br />surrounding properties. <br />go The proposed ea�°xarace �EII eaot impair an adeq€�ate s�pply of light �r�d air to ad�acent <br />property ot° su�st��tially ►ncre�se t�e congest�o� of �he publie s#r�eis oa° in�re�se ti�e <br />clanger oi f re or endanger th� public safety or substantially dire�inish or i�e►e�ai�� <br />pra�eriy values vvithin tl�e �r�ighbor4�oo€�o � <br />The proposed variance would not result in any of the above-cited adverse ef�'ects with the <br />exception of a possible increase in congestion on Hiilview Road. <br />.�r�blic C`otn�ent: <br />This zneeting has been published as a public hearing and notices have been mailed out to property <br />owners within 350 feet of 2075 Hillview Road. I have received two phone calls regarding this <br />request, one frorri the adjoining property owner to the east, and the other fi-om the owner o� <br />Colonial Village. The neighbor was simply in#erested in learning tnore about the request and did <br />not immediateiy indicate a posiiion regarding the variance request. The owner of Coloniai Village <br />was opposed to the expansion, especially if ihere was inadequate parkir�g to support the <br />expanszon. <br />�ecor�cnaendaiaon: <br />StaflFrecommends that ihe variance request, as submitted; should be denied. If however the applicant <br />', were to submit a survey and siie plan showing a parking e�pansion such that a mimimum af IS <br />`' parking stalls are provided, a variance might then be justified regarding ihe garage requirement, <br />Thus, there appears to be two options for the Commission to consider: <br />A. Direct sta,ffto draft a resolution denying the variance on ihe basis that {1} there is no apparent <br />hardship to warrant approvai and (2) the impact io the neighborhood could be substantial <br />B. Take no aciion on the request, allowing the applicant time to survey the property and to <br />design and submi� a parking expansion plan sufficieni to satisfy the total number of parking <br />stalls required by the Zoning Code. <br />� ; ._ . �� <br />James Ericsan <br />Community Development Director <br />Attachments: <br />1. Zoning Map <br />2, Location Map <br />3. Photographzc Documentation <br />`E <br />4. Site Plan <br />N:1DA.TAIGRO[TP5ICOMDEV1Development CaseslVRQ3-001 (Bui)�Parking Variance - Feb 5, 20p3.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.