Laserfiche WebLink
Farrell Variance Reporf <br />July 2, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br />c. That the special conditions or circurnstanc�s do not result from the actions af the <br />appficant. <br />d. Thaf granting the variance requested would noY confer an the appficant any special privilege <br />that is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. <br />e. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate #he hardship. <br />Economic conefitions alone shall not be considered a hardship. <br />f. The variance would not be materially defirimentaf to the purpose of this Title or #o other <br />property in the same zone. <br />g. 7he proposed variance will not impair an adequafie supply of light and airto �djacent property <br />or substantialiy increase the congestion of the public sireets or increase the danger of fire or <br />endan��r the public safefiy or subsfiantia{ly diminish or impair property values within the <br />r�eighbarhood. <br />Criferia Responses: <br />a. The exceptional or exfiraordinary circumstances associated with this lot, as identified in <br />previous variance resolutions, are that the developmenf potentiai of the lo� is restricted by <br />its size, the County's taking of ten feet of right of way alongside County Road f and by fihe <br />City`s corner lot sefiback requirements. <br />b. While ifi car� be argu�d thaf the fiteral interpreta�ions of #he Code do noi deprive the <br />property owner of rights enjoyed by others, the posting of the No Parking sigr�s has in fact <br />firnited Mr. Farre[l's ability to utilize on-sireet parking. <br />c. While Mr. Farrell does uitimately control the number of vehicles parking on the lofi and <br />whiie he was aware of the parking limitations when he purchased the property, Mr. Farrell <br />c{id not design the building or sife plan and had anticipated utilizing on-street parking for <br />over�low purposes. <br />d. Granting fihe variance would no# confer on t�►e appiicanf any speciaf privilege in that other <br />commercialiy-zaned properties have been awarded reduced parking setbacks in unique <br />situations. <br />e. Approving a variance from #he approved 10-foot parking lot setback to a 2-faof setback is <br />fihe minimum varianc� to alleviaie the hardship in fihat two additionai parking stalls could <br />be added to the lo�. <br />The variance would nof be ma�erially detrimenfaf io the purpose of �his Title or to other <br />property in the same zone in fhat the variance would serve to minimize fhe amount of onm <br />street business parking associated with the businesses at 2402 County Road I. <br />g. ihe variance would not impair an adequate supply of light and air fo adjacent property or <br />subsfantially increase fihe congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or <br />er�danger the public safiety or substantialfy diminish neighborhood property values. <br />�, <br />; <br />; ::, <br />�,::;:.:�..j <br />