2003 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

� �, � � �. � �� t = �; ' � ' = �' � � i__ � ��'"`: �' � �� . -'! .r�� � ° �` ''. � : !.- �; `� , � � � :,_ . � � �-_ . �■� �•� �� . �. `�- ,� ' ,�, �� ' i f � �:4� � = �� .., :. � ��; _ `. � ` �� .. � . ,,: . . � ,� �, � , � _. ,, ,, . ' ; - y. � � .. �' � - .. .. i: _ � �� . . ' '' " ' �, ��° �. 1 '� 1 1 �� �HEREAS, the ap�licant, John Kopas, has applied for a variance from the maxirrlum wall-mounted signage alfotments for fhe [�uifding iocated afi 2214-2222 County Highway 10; and, UlPH�REAS, Sec mounted sign�ge for a and, tion 1008.09 of the Sign Code indicafies that the maximum wall- commercia! building is 100 square feet per busi��ess occupant; WWEREAS, Mr. Kopas requests an additional 50 square feet per corner business occupant—Abbey Carpet and 3 Seasons and 4 Sunrooms; and, l�H�REAS, Section 1 b08.16 of the Sign Code indicates that variance requests be ;:, treated as any other variance request as articulafied in Secfiion 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of `';+ fihe Mounds View Zoning Code; and, lNNEREAS, according to Section 1125.Q2, the Planning Commission is to review a standard sefi o# criteria, of which aN musi be satisfied, i�� order fo grant a variance to the Zoning Code. NOU41, TFi�R�FOR�, �E IT F�ES�L�lED, the Mounds View Planning Commission makes �he following finding of facts related to this request: The building at 2214e2222 County Highway 10 is in need o# additional exterior wail-mounted signage or� the north and south b�ilding elevations to provide enhanced visibiiity adjacent to larger developments which may obscure the subject property. 2. The literal interpretation of the provisions of #his Title would deprive the applican� of righ#s com��only enjoyed by ather properties in ihat fihe City has approved similar variances in the past for reasonable sign variance requests. 3. The special conditions or circumstances necessitating the variance request do not resu(f from the acfions oi the applicant. 4. Granting the variance would not confer upon the property owner a speciaf . privilege in that every property owner has the right to apply for a variance to improve the function and viability of their business. Neither would such approval - confer a special treatmeni as similar reasonable variances have been granted in the past.