My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Itern Rlo: 7 <br />M�eting Date: Auqust 20, 2003 <br />iype o� �a�siness: Commission Business <br />/ ` . <i ` `I .:, � , `� ; <br />`To; Maunds View Planni�g Commission <br />Frorr�: Jame� Ericson, Communify Development Director <br />Item T�tI�1S�bje�t: Discussian and Consideration of Rezoning Actions <br />Associaied with the Public Facilities Zoning Districts. <br />Special Planning Case SP-118-03 <br />,,t ,,: <br />On July 14, 2003, the City Atfiorney addressed tl�e City Council regarding the Mounds View's <br />PF Zonin� Districfi and recommended that the City sirongiy consider revising the district`s <br />purpose and to rezone some or all prop�riies wifihin the PF dis�rict to another distric4 more <br />IogicalEy suited. The Cify Attorney'� lei�er, dated July �4, 2003, a copy of my <br />correspondence fio the Ci�y Council and Chapter 111 � of the Mounds View Zoning Cade are <br />attached for yo�r review. Also included for your reference is a copy of the City's "Facility <br />Guide." The City Councii, responding to the City Atfiorney's repor�, directed s#aff fo bring this <br />issue to the Pfanning Commission for review and it requested fhat the Commission draft a <br />proposed ordinance for the Council's consideration. <br />- -� <br />Di�c�as�ior�: <br />� <br />>, <br />-- The City Attarney highlights the recent Supreme Court decision relating to ihe Eiler Media `s <br />(now doing business as Clear Channel Outdoor} request for bi(Iboards from MnDOT. The <br />Supreme Court's ruiing called info quesfiion the Cify's zoning practices as it relates to the PF <br />district, in thafi the oniy parcels in the disfirict are municipally-owned while other simifar uses <br />are zoned difFerentiy. Zoning based on ownership rather than based on the nafure af the <br />use is inconsistent wifh conventionaf and practical zoning concepts. The fo(lowing <br />represents a fufl lisf of the uses tha� are present wifhin the City's PF districf: <br />1. City parks: (Groveland, Lambert, Random, Hillview, Ardan, Greenfield, <br />Oakwood, Silverview , Lakeside �each and Woodcrest parks} <br />2. Wells & Pump houses <br />3. City Hall <br />4. Water Treatmenfi Plant <br />5. Wafer Tow�r <br />6. The gridges Golf Course <br />7. Community Center <br />� Two maps are attached to ihis report. The first map represents alI PF zoned parcels shaded <br />��� in dark blue. Th� second map represents the proposed rezoning of each of ihe PF parceEs <br />fo one of three disiricts: Single family residential, industrial or regionai commercial. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.