My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Tdlou�td� V�ew Pi�t�u��g Comnaiss��� July 16, 2Q03 <br />l�e��lar 1Vlee�i�g I'age 2 <br />4o Citize�s Itequest� ar�c� Coanrn�nts oe� �tems IVot o� the Agenda <br />None. <br />Se Con�ideratio� o� 12esolution l�o. 'i33-03 Appro�iv� � V�r��a�ce �� Allm�� a i�educeci <br />Fro�t Yax�d �etback to Co�siruct az� Additio�. �IRQ3POfl� <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained the a�plicant's reque'st and indic�ted iliat <br />the homes in the area are all setback at 50 feet from the piopei-�y line arid'`are 75 feet frofn the <br />street. He then indicated that he had included the letter frorri,;�the applicant explaining her requesf <br />and addressing the issue of hardship in this case. <br />Director Ericson indicaied that Staff reviewed the cri#eria and feeis that su:Fficie��t hardship exists <br />to meet the requirements and recommends approval. He ihen indicated tliat tivs matter was set <br />for public hearing and there are residents in attendance for t�i,e issue. �Ie fiirthcr commented that <br />the Planning Commission would need to determine;w�ether it feels that the l�ardship <br />requirements are rnet and, if so, can act on Resalution`733-03: approvu�g tlie variance. <br />Commissioner Zwim aslced whether 2191.;, 2185, and;�295 are set back. at the 50 feet because it <br />seems the lots are shorter there. <br />, .��. <br />Director Ericson indicated that he kiad not n�casured all the properties on the blocic but it <br />appeared that all were at the same distance from ihe street `' <br />Chair Steveuson opened t]ae �ublic.hea�-ing at 7:Q8 p.m: <br />Joan Basard addresscd �hc Cornmission. and indicated that the street is at an angle to the <br />properties and she c%aes riot think iliat those houses are as far bacic. She then said that �e iwo- <br />stoiry house to the right of hers has a porch:tfiat sticics out six feet from ihe house. <br />Diractor Ericson hanc�ec� out copies of the plans for the expansion of the home for review. <br />Christy Moore of 2234 La�nbert said she faels this is a good plan to improve the property and the <br />tax base for the City and,she would hope that the Commission would a�prove this improvexnent. <br />,, � <br />She then commented th'at'ske wili wani to expand her small liome in the future and would be <br />faced with a similar set:back issue and would look to the Commission for support of a variance <br />i� tlie future. <br />Cornmissioner Johnson asked why ihe City's Code is so stz�ict on ihis and said that all new <br />deveio�n�ents stagger the houses rather than setting them all back at the same distance. <br />Directorc Ericson indicated that the City's Code was drafted bacic when it was tha norm to set all <br />the houses bacic the exact distance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.