Laserfiche WebLink
T°�Ianncis `Izew PIan�A�� Com�assion .Tuly 169 2003 <br />Re�ula�- I@�eeti�� Pag� 4 <br />7. Disca�ss �a°oposeci IVYo�Iifications to Propo�ed Orciinance 711, a� Or°dinans� Relating <br />to the Zoa�in� of P�w�shops. 5�aecial Plan�i�� Case �P-114�03 <br />Community Developmeni Director Ez-icson indicated that the City Council had aslced that the <br />Planning Commission discuss the issue of overlay zoning for the pawnshop a�zd other adult <br />orzented businesses. He tk�en pointed out on the �nap the two proposed aareas for-:the c�verlay <br />district. <br />Director Ericson asked for input as to which overlay <br />what types of uses the Commissian felt would be ap� <br />district. <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated that he did not Iike the <br />too many resxdents. <br />Z the Coxxaznission would prefeir, and <br />ely located iri such an overlay <br />ond optiou� because it is too close to <br />Director Ericson indicated that a lot of people havc cxpressed a preferei <br />because it is separated from any residential, churches schools, daycares <br />heart af the City. <br />Director Ericson indicated that the City would have <br />some comment as zt is adjacent to them ari�i the sam <br />district were selected. � <br />one <br />from the <br />f Blaine as they may have <br />New Brighton if the other <br />Commissione� Hegland sai� he is concerned that sti�ch a laz:ge��area is being destgnated for the <br />overlay district because everi `tliough right 1�ow thcrc may riot be many places to locate within <br />that oveilay districi future uscs of that properky is unlcnown to the City and it opens the City up <br />to allowing more af these types of�ises because tliere would be room available. <br />Director Er-icsoii incli�ated the reason Council suggested a large area is to minimize legal risk for <br />the City because creatiiig;a very s�nall district within which it wouid be impossible to locate <br />could open t1�e. City up io a legal cl3allexlge. <br />Commissioner Hegland sugg�sted that the area could be smaller because Mounds View is a <br />small'City overall and there should be some consideration for i:hat in figuring the size for the <br />dzstrict. He #hen said that;he`wauld lilce io do further research into the requirements and issues <br />aundin the creation o <br />surr g f an overlay dishict before he is prepared to vote on it. <br />Coiiail�issioner Zwun indicated that he agreed with Com�nissioner Johnson with regard to option <br />o��e becausc it is �.vvay from residential areas. He also noted that option two may interfere with <br />I�rew Brighior�'s proposal to build residentzal and seniar housing in the area. <br />Chair ;tevenson indicated he was not in favor of either one. <br />Commissioner Scotch indicated she was not in favor of either one. She then said thai she fee2s <br />the proposed area is too large. ; <br />