My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i`�Io�nds `Tflew PTamnfn� Corr���ssion J�ly 16, 2003 <br />Regular I'VleetBng Page 6 <br />Director Ericson indicated that back in 1996 the City went through a similar process for adult <br />uses and that was included in the 5taff report. He then said that seven years later ihe City has nat <br />had any requests for adult uses and that may be because of the strict licensing requirement�"an.d it <br />may malce it easier to locate here if the overlay district comes in. He further co�ui�ented`that he <br />is concerned with what might happen if a red light district is creaied but perhaps others'do not <br />mind that. <br />Chair Stevenson indicated he did not feel it made sense to lui�p �in adult use"s when tvos� �are <br />already addressed in the Code. He then said he would like to.;leave that out and adclress ��here to <br />zone or vvhere an overlay dist�ict for a pawnshop sl�ould ba located. <br />Cornrnissioner Johnson indicated the only way he would want ta lun�p. adult uses into the overlay <br />district is if it made things more restrictive than the current C;ode. <br />Director Ericson indicated that the owner of the proposed pawns: <br />district but he has received no update from him on the �a�viishap <br />�pposed to an overlay <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked whether ihere was a:l�g�l r•easoz� to tie the adult uses to the <br />pawnshop discussion. <br />Director Erieson indicated that a Council,Iulember had aslced tliat the Planning Commission <br />consider adult uses that may not be acceptable to, the average;resident at the same time as the <br />pawnshops are heing discussed <br />Chair Stevenson commented'that at one meetin� t�e �oinmission restricted the space to allow a <br />pawnshop.�io'4,400 square feet and: now the City is iallcing about an area that is several acres. <br />Commissioner Hegland indicatcd that ihe City couid no longer lunit it to one pawnshop with that <br />large area. <br />Director Ericson indicated that Mounds..View Square is approximately seven acres and the both <br />overlaydistricts are inuch larger, <br />ctor Ericson inc <br />from the pawn, <br />�mething tha� is <br />he would get fe <br />ie would raft a recommendatian for the Council separating out adult <br />i talce a second loolc at the proposed overlay district and scale it bacic <br />.ble but not overly permissible for how much space the�e is. He also <br />from the City Attorney. <br />'�onunissioner. Scotch said that she feels 4,000 sc�uaxe feet is tao much and she vvould prefer to <br />restrict it to 20Q0 or even 1flOQ square feet and not wo�-ry about the overlay districts. <br />Director Ericson indicated that Council is opposed to the location in Mounds View Square <br />regardless of the size so the Coinmission needs to determine an overlay location. <br />; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.