2003 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

1�OT�I�tDS VIE� PI.Al�lOIII�G CO�VII�II��IOI� �E50LU'�'I�1� iVO. 719-03 �IT�' �I' Ii�IOUI�DS �1��/ ��iTIV�`�' OF �11VY�EI' S'k'A'I'E O�` lYIII�I�ESO'I'A �� - .�� ; . �, ��. .�: �� ; _ -, ��,, : R, �. �, . : � . �� . � ■; � '�� .� : ; ; � .� .� �-, _ : �;� " ,�. , ': � :; . .� .�: �; � � . �, .. ,, �, ;;` „ , ,; .. ' ,: : : �,: .� � ��: , . t � � ��: • ' 1 :` � � :!� "<�� �► ; .� �. � . : � , .. _ �, � �. .� � ��,� � 'WI�E�.4�, The applicant, Thuy Thi Bui, has applied for a variance from the minimum parking requirement for a multiple-family dwelling; aiid, W�IEREA�, The applicant is proposing to expand the existing �our-unit dwelling to a six- unit dwelling; and ��E�EI�S, the property is zoned R-3, Medium Density Residential, wkuch allows a six- unit dwelling; and i�I�EI2EA�, The City Code requires I.5 parking spaces per unit plus 1 garage space per ;; unit; and, - ��EA�, The property currenily has 12 parking spaces, of which only 2 are garage spaces; and `�fi'�EREA�, according ta Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, the Fianning Commission is to review a standard set of criieria, of which all must be saiisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. I�t�W, 'T�E�tEFOItE, �E IT 1�E�OL�I), the Mounds View Planning Commission makes the foliowing finding of facts related to this request: There are no exceptional or extraordinary conditions relatir�g to this raquest or to the property. 2. The literal interpretation oithe Zoning Code, Chapter 1121, Parking Requirements, does not deny the applicant rights commonly enjoyed by other R-3 properties. 3. The applicant, by virtue of the desire to expand the building, has caused ihe conditio�s which necessitate the variance request. 4. Granting the variance would confer upon the applicant a special privilege not enjoyed by others in this zoning district. 5. Granting the variance would be detrimental to the neighborhood in that par�r�king problems already gresent would be exacerbated.