My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No: 5 <br />Meeting Date: December 17, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Discussion <br />City of Mounds l/iew Staff R� <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: Kristin Prososki, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Possible Revisions to the Zoning <br />Code to Allow for an Administrative Variance <br />Approval Process; Special Planning Case SP-120-03 <br />Introduction: <br />At the Planning Commission's last meeting on December 3, 2003, Staff made a <br />presentation regarding an administrative variance approval process. Staff has <br />researched this option due to the number of variance requests that the City receives. The <br />process for an administrative variance is similar to the formal variance process, except <br />that Staff makes the decision in approving or denying the variance instead of the Planning <br />Commission. This process is allowed only for variance requests within certain limitations, <br />suggested by the Planning Commission and ultimately decided by the City Council. In <br />order to qualify for this process, a hardship must exist and the same variance criteria will <br />be evaluated for each request. <br />Discussion: <br />The Planning Commission was generally supportive of the administrative variance <br />approval process. Based on direction given to Staff during discussion at the previous <br />meeting, Staff recommends the following guidelines: <br />1) Limits and Standards — Staff recommends that administrative variances be <br />limited to setback variance requests in R-1 or R-2 districts. In addition, staff <br />feels it is reasonable to require that the requested amount be within 25% of <br />the code requirement. Below is a table displaying possible percentage limits <br />and how many feet a request could deviate from code. For example, if the <br />Commission chooses to limit the requests to variances within 25% of code, a <br />applicant could request that a home be allowed to encroach up to two and a <br />hatf (2.5) feet into the side setback. <br />10% 20% 25% 30% <br />30 ft front/rear setback 3 ft 6 ft 7.5 ft 9 ft <br />10 ft (side setback) 1 ft 2 ft 2.5 ft 3 ft <br />2) Application Review — Staff recommends allowing the Community <br />Development Director to grant administrative variances. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.