Laserfiche WebLink
_ <br />.� �w- _ _ � � `.____�__ _: __ ___- ___ _ _ __ <br />�� _ _ _ <br />7emporary Structures Report <br />December 17, 2003 <br />Page 3 <br />Options: <br />1. Do Nothing. This option would maintain the status quo regarding temporary structures. <br />They would continue to be prohibited ands their presence would constitute a violation of <br />the Zoning Code. If observed or reports, the City would send a letter and provide <br />residents with a reasonable time frame in which to remove the structure. <br />2. Amend the Code to Permit Temporary Structures in Certain Circumstances. The <br />Zoning Code could be amended to add a provision by which temporary structures could <br />be erected with a permit for a reasonable period of time not to exceed a certain duration. <br />If this option is chosen, staff would suggest one month permits not to exceed three <br />months in duration unless mitigating circumstances are present. Staff would support this <br />option. <br />3. Amend the Zoning Code to Eliminate prohibition altogether. While staff would not <br />recommend such an action, the code could be amended to eliminate the language added <br />in 2000 and treat temporary structures as any other outdoor accessory building subject to <br />the same setback requirements and maximum area requirements. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff requests that the Planning Commission discuss these options and provide direction as <br />to whether a Code amendment is appropriate, and if so, which of the two amendment options <br />would be preferred and under what conditions, if any. Based on your direction, staff will <br />prepare for your action a draft ordinance at your next meeting, January 7, 2004. <br />< � Ct.,�'�.& ( .-1�.-��GlL. <br />James Ericson <br />Community Development Director <br />Attachments: <br />1. Photographic Documentation <br />2. Temporary metal framed structure plan <br />-') <br />: _, <br />