My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_ _. . _ i__..._ L '`�_ l <br />_ � _ _ . _- _ <br />--- _- ' _ . u,�.- ' , _ ---- �a.� � �: _ �- �.�. s< -. _:_ � : : :. �� . — - z w::_ - ----� <br />Mounds View Plann'rng Commission 1)ecember 3, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />Planner Prososlci indicated she had reached a representative of the coinpany and was told by him <br />that they accept responsibility for the error and said it was due to a miscommunication. <br />Mr. Thompson indicated he would lilce to keep the driveway as it is since it is done, but if <br />necessary, he can have the pavement removed and grade it for grass or crushed rock. <br />Acting Chair Miller indicated there are criteria that have to be met for the Plarniing Cominission <br />to grant a variance and this case does not meet the criteria. <br />Commissioner Zwirn assured the Thompsons that the City would work with them to negotiate <br />resolution of this matter with the blacictop company. <br />Acting Chair Miller aslced tl�at the language to be added to the Resolution be read. <br />Planner Prososlci read the language. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Zwin�/Jol-uison. To Approve Resolution 744-03, a Resolution Denying a <br />Variance from the Maximum Curb Cut Width Requirement to Allow a Previously Constiucted <br />Driveway Addition to Remain. <br />Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion cai��ied. <br />7. Public Hearing and Discussion Regarding a Request for a Side Yard Setback <br />Variance at 5072 Brighton Lane. <br />Planner Prososlci indicated that the applicant wishes to construct a second story addition over the <br />garage but requires a sideyard variance to do so since the home is constructed on a small lot and <br />the garage is within 8 feet of the lot line. She then indicated that Staff feels the hardship <br />requirements can be met in this case as the lot is smaller than the City's minimum standards and <br />the home is under the minimum square footage requirements. The front yard is sloped in such a <br />fashion that expansion that way is not feasible and in the rear yard there is an existing decic and <br />mature trees. <br />The Commission agreed that this addition would be an improvement to the home and noted that <br />there is no expansion of the footprint of the home and no expansion of the encroachment into the <br />setbacic as the expansion is directly on top of the existing garage that is 8 feet from the property <br />line. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Hegland/Zwirn. To Approve Resolution 746-03, a Resolution Approving <br />a Variance to Allow for an Eight-Foot Sideyard Setback for a Living-Space Addition at 5072 <br />Brighton Lane. <br />Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion canried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.