My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-2001 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
02-12-2001 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:26 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 9:23:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/12/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/12/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 12, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney questioned what other cities use the same PCI and what percentage of <br />the PCI do they use to determine when the street should be repaired. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Ulrich indicated he thought Roseville used the same PCI. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney asked if that percentage was 70%. <br /> <br />Public works director Ulrich indicated he was not sure what the percentage was. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney requested that Staff check other cities for what their PCI percentage <br />cutoff number is for determining when a street must be repaired. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Ulrich indicated he would check into it and also stated he could check <br />with the City’s consultant as a large number of cities use the same consultant. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated there was a big difference in the projects mentioned by Mr. <br />Ulrich in his earlier comments as one project is an MSA street and the other is a City streets so <br />repairs are paid by residents. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Ulrich clarified that the residents on County Road H2 would pay for half <br />of 26 foot of asphalt and base to 9/10 design. They will not pay for anything else. Residents on <br />the northern side with the exception of Arden would pay for 100% of the rehabilitation. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney asked how many streets the City is planning on doing during what <br />period of time. How many is the City projected to do over what period of time and how many <br />are MSA versus non-MSA. He noted there is $1.6 million in special projects funds and said the <br />City could perhaps use that money for street projects. He also asked Staff to check into using <br />funds in the TIF interest fund for funding the street project repairs. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Ulrich noted he had asked the finance director for a brief analysis as the <br />franchise fee was mentioned at the work session to raise it to fund street improvement projects. <br />The finance director told him the current City taxes of an average household are approximately <br />$410.00. If the entire four (4) percent of the franchise fee was used to pay off bond payments <br />virtually eliminating a street assessment for street repairs for the next 20 years, using the scenario <br />that the City would do approximately $1 million dollars worth of street projects every other year, <br />the increase in tax dollars to figure the current 2% and the additional 2% it would mean an <br />increase of 13.5% meaning the City needs another $280,000 annually to fund street projects <br />using the franchise fee. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Ulrich indicated the average franchise fee paid per resident is <br />approximately $60.00 per year. In essence with a tax increase of approximately $55.00 plus <br />another $30.00 for franchise fee the resident would pay $1600 - $2000 over a twenty year period. <br />These figures include inflation and rising construction costs. They are paying for assessments or <br />bonding in some way shape or form. Doesn’t know how residents would prefer to pay for the <br />assessment.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.