My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/02/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/02/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:26 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 9:23:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/12/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/12/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 22, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated the City is not imposing the hardship. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas indicated the City would be imposing the timeline and does have the <br />option of making it hard or easy for Mr. Wilson to comply. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated he believes the City has a responsibility to <br />consider the residents who have had to wait for a year to have this issue resolved. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas suggested giving Mr. Wilson 60 days to make the changes to the <br />structure. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre explained that by keeping the 30-day time limit Mr. Wilson could get a warning <br />if the structure is not changed within 30 days and would then have another 30 days to complete <br />the changes to the structure for a total of 60 days before he would be cited. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty stated in light of how Mr. Wilson has procrastinated in dealing with the <br />City on this issue he is hesitant to allow any more than 30 days. <br /> <br />Housing Inspector Jeremiah Anderson stated the City is caught in a situation where it feels the <br />need to provide due process for Mr. Wilson which tends to drag things out. In his opinion, Mr. <br />Wilson has been provided with due process and residents need closure on this issue. Had Mr. <br />Wilson applied for a permit this whole situation could have been avoided. In light of the <br />circumstances surrounding this matter Housing Inspector Anderson indicated he does not think <br />30 days is an unreasonable amount of time to bring the structure into compliance. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomas. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 5521, a <br />Resolution Denying the Appeal of the Planning Commission Denial of a Variance for a Zero- <br />Foot Garage Addition Setback at 7764 Greenwood Drive, Requested by Property Owner John <br />Wilson. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />E. Direct Staff to Create Specific Job Descriptions for Each Commission and <br />Committee Within the City. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty suggested having Staff draft job descriptions for each commission and <br />committee within the City. This would make it easier for those applying for the positions and for <br />Staff and Council to know what each commission and committee position entails. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas questioned whether the job descriptions are something that can be <br />easily gathered from the bylaws of the various commissions or committees or from City Code. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller stated it is her understanding that not all commissions have bylaws and <br />the ones that do exist are somewhat vague. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.