My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-2001 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
02-12-2001 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:26 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 9:23:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/12/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/12/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 12, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney inquired as to why there was a need to expand the pond as the City just <br />put in the Community Center pond. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Ulrich clarified there was not a problem with the pond for the area it was <br />built to drain. He then explained that back in 1996 when Bronson Drive was reconstructed the <br />City contemplated purchasing the Midland Videen property and thought that would include a <br />larger wetland and retention pond. The City did not purchase the property and, consequently, <br />there was no retention pond constructed. The City requested as part of the Walgreen’s <br />Development Agreement that they expand the pond and connect it between the storm sewer <br />around the Midland Videen property and cross under County Highway 10 and expand in the <br />frontage on Bronson Drive. The Walgreen’s officials determined the land swap was too <br />expensive for them and that item was removed from the Developer’s Agreement. This item was <br />presented at the work session and Staff had requested to use funds to expand the pond. It was <br />Staff’s understanding that this item was approved at the work session. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney noted he believed Walgreen’s was putting in a pond that was to be a <br />regional pond. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Ulrich explained the pond going in is to replace the pond on Edgewood <br />Drive and to take care of Walgreen’s impervious surfaces and is not a regional pond. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney stated it was his understanding Walgreen’s would be creating a <br />regional pond. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained there is a storm sewer running under <br />Edgewood Drive that will be diverted partially into the new pond. One of the requirements is <br />that some of the water underneath Edgewood Drive be handled by the Walgreen’s pond. This is <br />a different drainage shed than Bronson Drive. Walgreen’s deemed the water issue on Bronson <br />drive not to be related to their project and declined to install a regional pond. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney clarified Walgreen’s was not creating a regional pond on either side of <br />the property. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated it depends on what a person calls the pond. <br />The pond will take runoff from the City Hall property, the property to be developed, and some <br />water under Edgewater Drive. It will not, however, treat the water on Bronson Drive. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney asked whether treating the water was of benefit to the Rice Creek <br />Watershed. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Ulrich indicated it was of benefit to filter the water before it entered the <br />watershed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.