My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/03/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/03/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:06 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 9:35:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/26/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/26/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 12, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />noting they have a team to work on funding for the project. She also explained BRW was the <br />most qualified of the companies noting they were the firm who worked on the Highway 96 <br />reconstruction in Shoreview. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney stated he felt BRW should be able to estimate the costs for the <br />drawings and estimate future costs based on those drawings. He then stated he did not feel it was <br />acceptable to grant an open-ended contract noting he would prefer to have an estimate of the total <br />costs. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller stated this project was in the early planning stages which is why there <br />is not a total estimate for costs at this point. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney expressed concern for ending up with a grandiose plan that the City <br />could not afford. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas asked if BRW was the only firm with staff to do grant research. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated one other firm had staff for grant research but noted the <br />difference between the two firms was quite significant. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomas. To Table Resolution 5537 to allow Staff Time to Further <br />Research the Costs Involved. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />B. Resolution 5541, Authorizing the Hiring of a Police Officer, from a Certified <br />List of Candidates. <br /> <br />Assistant to the Administrator Reed noted one of the police officer candidates selected at the <br />February 26, 2001 meeting had accepted a job with another city. She then noted Council would <br />need to consider the next two names on the list and those names are August Wehmeyer and Kirk <br />Leitch. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty recommended Council consider Kirk Leitch for the position. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas asked why Council Member Marty had recommended the lesser- <br />ranked individual. <br /> <br />Assistant to the Administrator Reed noted Council could have the Police Civil Service <br />Commission review and advise Council as to how to proceed. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 5541, A <br />Resolution Authorizing the Hiring of Kirk Leitch as a Police Officer, from the Certified List. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.