My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/04/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/04/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:21 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 9:40:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/9/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/9/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 26, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />residents do not have much say on decisions such as these. He stated the City Council does not <br />rule Mounds View except as stated by the City Charter. He stated he wished this Council would <br />take heed of public resistance to proposed projects. He stated he thinks the question is not what <br />kind of new numbers are needed to fund the golf course but the more important question is <br />should government be in business. He asked Council to answer that question and then proceed. <br /> <br />Mr. Jahnke stated he feels the golf course should fly on its own if it is going to fly. He noted he <br />had been told by a previous mayor that the City would make money hand over fist with the golf <br />course. He then stated he does not believe in gambling because he can’t stand the suspense of <br />wondering whether or not he will win. He further stated the suspense for the golf course issue is <br />comparable to gambling for him. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre commented that the second portion of Mr. Jahnke’s comments was far more <br />meaningful and heartfelt than the first portion as he spoke what he felt rather than reading a <br />prepared statement. <br /> <br />Mr. Jahnke then stated he is not judging this Council yet and will reserve judgment to see how <br />Council handles the issues. <br /> <br />Jacolyn Sjodin of 8285 Eastwood Road stated she has been working with children for 12 years as <br />a teacher and truly believes in good quality child care programs. She then stated that after this <br />program was closed she was heartbroken for the parents looking for child care as it is a very <br />difficult task. She further stated the program that was in place was a good one and she hopes <br />Council looks at the situation and can find a way to continue with another child care program. <br /> <br />Council recessed to a closed session discussion at 7:54 p.m. <br /> <br />Council reconvened at 8:53 p.m. <br /> <br />10. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. Discussion, Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution 5540, a <br />Resolution Approving a Development Review and Conditional Use Permit <br />for Pinewood Elementary School, located at 5500 Quincy Street. <br /> <br />Director Ericson explained the public hearing was set in anticipation of a recommendation from <br />the Planning Commission. As the Planning Commission was not able to forward a <br />recommendation to Council, Staff is requesting that the public hearing be continued to the next <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Director Ericson noted he anticipated the Planning Commission would take action on April 4, <br />2001 and this matter would be back before Council on April 9, 2001. He further noted there <br />were a few residents present for this matter and he had explained the matter would be continued <br />to the next meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.