My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/04/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/04/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:32 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 9:45:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/23/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/23/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 9, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />Stigney questioned whether Rice Creek Watershed would be conducting an environmental <br />impact study. <br /> <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated they have not performed one and could <br />still do so but stated that decision is left up to the discretion of the board. She then stated that all <br />of the elements that would be analyzed in an impact statement will be looked at as part of the <br />design process. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the City would receive an acre per acre wetland credit. <br /> <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated wetland credits are based on how much <br />wetland is created and there is no discretion. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney stated that the pond seemed quite large to him and questioned whether <br />something smaller could be done. <br /> <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative explained that at 3.7 acres they would begin <br />losing the cost effectiveness for the project. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked what it would take to remove the pond once it is in place. <br /> <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative indicated the pond is filled in with dirt. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked if the City wanted to fill in the pond to develop the property if it <br />was expensive to do so. <br /> <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated if the District does grant wetland credits <br />to the City it would be virtually impossible to develop the property as there are restrictions and <br />covenants that go along with the granting of wetland credits. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick questioned if approving the pond would prevent future development in <br />that area. <br /> <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated the wetland area and upland buffer <br />would not be able to be developed. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas stated she felt there were so many advantages and disadvantages that <br />this matter was hard to prioritize. She then stated she felt that a smaller pond may be worth <br />building but stated she did not feel she could support a large pond. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre stated it was his understanding the Resolution is in favor of the proposal based <br />on Council preference for size of the pond. He then explained there was a beneficial meeting <br />with MNDOT where it was discovered that there may have been an inappropriate decision made <br />when it came to determining Mounds View was not eligible for the sound wall. He further stated <br />that a representative from MNDOT had indicated that if the City were to put in an earthen berm
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.