Laserfiche WebLink
Pinewood Report <br />April 23, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />location, thus no variance was required. However, because there is the existing encroachment with <br />no evident approval, the City Attorney has advised that a Limited Use Agreement should be <br />executed which would protect the City’s interests and hold us harmless from any potential <br />liabilities, however remote they may be. The Limited Use Agreement is attached for the Council’s <br />review. <br /> <br />The parking lot proposed for the southwest corner of the lot will replace existing pavement used as <br />a playground. The playground asphalt is currently 25 feet from the south property line. It is <br />proposed that the new pavement would be 30 feet from the property line, in keeping with Code <br />requirements for a parking lot. <br /> <br />Building Materials: The building expansion will become a seamless addition to the existing <br />facility by matching to the fullest extent possible the existing brick. The rooftop mechanical <br />equipment will be screened to restrict public view. <br /> <br />Parking Requirements: There are currently 68 parking stalls available at Pinewood Elementary. It <br />has become evident that either due to poor on-site circulation or limited parking availability, <br />parking spills onto Quincy Street, a situation which has generated numerous complaints from <br />residents. The parking requirements for a school are such that one stall per classroom plus one stall <br />per fifty students shall be provided. Given the 32 classrooms and 660 students, our Code would <br />only require 46 stalls. Clearly this is not sufficient for Pinewood Elementary, which employs a staff <br />of 95. The expansion would increase the available parking on the site to 110 stalls, an increase of <br />42 stalls. It is expected that the parking expansion, if utilized by school staff, would alleviate most <br />of the parking problems. The administration indicated its intent to form a committee of neighbors, <br />staff, parents and administration to examine some of these issues in the long term. <br /> <br />Drainage and Utility: The applicant has applied for a Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) <br />permit, which is required due to the size and scope of the project area and the extent of impervious <br />surface being manipulated. The permit has or will be approved by RCWD. The new parking lot to <br />the south will drain into a vegetative swale to capture runoff and contaminants, a practice <br />encouraged by RCWD. Because no construction will be occurring within 100 feet of a wetland, no <br />City buffer permits are required. <br /> <br />Landscaping: Some of the existing landscaping and plantings will be removed and relocated as a <br />result of the building and parking lot expansion. Given the amount of existing mature landscaping, <br />the Planning Commission determined that no other landscaping should be required, other than to <br />restore any disturbed pervious areas. Some residents on Quincy Street indicated a need for <br />additional screening via shrubs or berming, a possibility that the to-be-formed committee will <br />investigate. If any landscaping is proposed, the Planning Commission indicated that the City <br />Forester should review and approve the plantings. <br /> <br />Lighting: A photometric analysis has been submitted for the project area which appears to be in <br />conformance with City glare and light spillage standards. The applicant will need to indicate which <br />fixtures are new on the plan, submit the specifications for the new individual fixtures and indicate <br />the height of the new light standards.