My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/07/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/07/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:53 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 10:02:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/9/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/9/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 11, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he had not heard before that the pre-July 1, 1997 funds had <br />been expended. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas stated she was not against the project but is against the fact that the <br />costs were raised by so much. She then indicated she would like to have the project re-evaluated <br />to determine if the project can be done less expensively as she feels $150,000 is too much to ask <br />the City to pay. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty asked how much of a delay the project could handle and still be <br />completed this construction year. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Parrish indicated he would pose the questions to the <br />engineer and see what, if anything, can be done. He then indicated that the only way to cut <br />money on the project as far as he was concerned is to make the project smaller but noted the City <br />would need to reduce the benefiting area and indicated making the pond smaller may not save <br />much money at all. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that reducing the size of the pond may <br />actually increase the costs because there would be a need to go back through the engineering <br />process and a need for new documents. He then indicated he would be willing to bet that making <br />the pond smaller would increase the costs because of the extra engineering fees involved. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas indicated that her question is not how to make the pond smaller but <br />how to make the pond fit the budget and whether that is possible. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated he was not sure if it could fit the budget. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick questioned what the funds would be used for if not for the pond. He <br />then stated that he thought the idea behind having TIF monies was to reinvest in the community <br />to enhance the City and make things work better rather than amassing a large sum of money in <br />the TIF fund. He further stated that he feels the TIF funds should be used rather than be left to sit <br />in the account and the City risk losing the funds. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty asked if there were any other uses for the land designated for the pond. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Parrish indicated the land needed to be used for a storm <br />water pond as the reason the Metropolitan Council deeded the land to the City was for a pond. <br />He also indicated the same was true for the School District. He further indicated that the clock <br />began running on the grant money in 1999 and the grant will expire on 12/31/01 which means the <br />funds need to be spent by then. He also noted that the City has made certain representations to <br />the School District that the construction of the pond would not have an impact on classes starting <br />this fall. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty indicated the $333,333 in grant monies needed to be spent or they would <br />be lost. He then indicated that if the City does not build the pond now it may be required to do so
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.