My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/07/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/07/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:07 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 10:16:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/23/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/23/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 25, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Reed stated she contacted other cities and they all charge <br />$200 in addition to whatever their onsale fee is. That fee is based on square footage for the <br />onsale fee. <br /> <br />Council Member Mart y inquired if that $200 fee was per Sunday or per year. Assistant to the <br />City Administrator Reed responded it is per year. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney commented on the level of policing at certain establishments. The <br />license fees are the same but some proper ties need to be policed more than others. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre said the $200 is a maximum set by statute for Sunday sales. He asked if police <br />calls have gone up a lot this year. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney expressed concern with the numbers from 1994. He asked i f we issue a <br />license every year and why we don’t look at the numbers of police calls annually. Assistant to <br />the City Administrator Reed responded we do. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre asked that since we’ re specifically dealing with the Sunday sales which gives us <br />a $2 00 maximum, can we direct the Staff to bring us a report as to the policy for setting the fee <br />formula. <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Reed referred to the Staff Report where it is stated that the <br />Mermaid pays $10,000 annually for their fee. That is the maximum based on the formula <br />adopted by the Council. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller explained that to change the fee structure it would have to be <br />discussed in a work session. <br /> <br />The public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, inquired whether this fee is for a certain event. Mayor <br />Sonterre explained the fee is just for the license to serve liquor on a Sunday. <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Reed stated that she gathered Staff reports from 1994 and <br />the number of police calls that year was taken into consideration for figuring the fee. The <br />formula was very complicated. The fee schedule only makes reference to square footage so the <br />number of police calls is included in the formula but is not necessarily taken into consideration <br />this year. The police are working with the Mermaid and felt the concerns have been resolved. <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Reed explained that she asked the police department whether <br />they have any concerns that would be a basis for denying a license. She referenced the year <br />1994 because that was the year the Council came up with this fee formula. <br /> <br />Gretchen Wallbridge, 8072 Long Lake Road, clarified whether the Mermaid is already paying <br />$10,000 and the $200 additional is just to sell liquor on a Sunday. She didn’t see the problem. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.