My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/08/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/08/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:33 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 10:19:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/13/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/13/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 9, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />B. Public Hearing to consider the First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance <br />683, an Ordinance Rezoning Property Located at 2525 County Road I from <br />R-1, Single Family Residential, to R-2, Single and Two Family Residential. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre opened the public hearing at 8:52 p.m. <br /> <br />Director of Community Development Ericson explained this request is from Ernie Gustafson <br />who owns 3 lots. There are 2 undeveloped lots north of his lot. Mr. Gustafson has put forward a <br />subdivision plan making his 3 lots into 4. Three of the 4 lots would be rezoned to R-2, and this <br />drawing is on Exhibit C, included in the packet. The Planning Commission held a public hearing <br />on this issue on June 4 and many residents appeared before the Commission, and most opposed <br />the proposal. Included in this packet are a couple of letters and one email. The Planning <br />Commission felt this would not be an appropriate change and wouldn’t fit in with the existing <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission approved a resolution that provided an alternative to rezoning. This is <br />shown on exhibit F in the packet. This resolution recommended that Lots 3 and 4 of Exhibit F <br />could be rezoned and be consistent with the housing that already exists. Mr. Gustafson is not in <br />favor of this. If he were to subdivide to 5 lots, he would accept one lot facing County Road I at <br />R-2. There is room for 5 lots, but the lot line would end up too close to Mr. Gustafson’s house. <br />There would be no access allowed from County Road I. Any R-2 lot would have to take frontage <br />from County Road I. Staff has prepared a rezoning ordinance for the Council’s consideration. <br />There several options of the Council’s actions which are: to approve the first reading; approve <br />the first reading with different rezoning; table the issue; or deny. Director Ericson invited Mr. <br />Gustafson to contribute to the public hearing as well as residents. <br /> <br />Commissioner Quick noticed that Exhibit C does not show 5 lots. Director Ericson explained <br />that option was proposed after the fact. Before the 5 lots can be drawn, the Planning <br />Commission would have to approve a variance for the setback on the side of the lot facing Long <br />Lake Road. <br /> <br />Ernie Gustafson, 2525 County Road I, stated that when he appeared before the Planning <br />Commission last month, he had proposed a subdivision of 3 lots. There would be a large duplex <br />lot next to the duplexes that are already there to the east. While Mr. Gustafson did not agree with <br />the option shown on Exhibit C, he did agree with the option shown on Exhibit F. He added that <br />when the tornado hit his home in 1965, he rebuilt the house so it could function as a duplex. He <br />said he hoped the area would be zoned to allow the duplex. He further explained that there is <br />105 feet from the Long Lake Property line to his home. There needs to be a 10 foot side yard and <br />he suggested taking 10 feet from his house. That leaves 95 feet by 135 feet on the corner of <br />County Road I and Long Lake Road. This demands a variance of 5 feet, and he is agreeable to <br />presenting that to the Planning Commission if need be. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.