My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/08/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/08/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:33 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 10:19:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/13/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/13/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 23, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs pointed out there is a 60-day waiting period after the public hearing, and <br />this could hold the action up. <br /> <br />Director Ulrich stated that all property owners on the east would be assessed. He suggested it <br />may be possible to have the property owners provide some type of document that they agree to <br />pay the assessments and work could begin sooner. He suggested the Charter Commission <br />consider this request. The 60-day waiting period is a long period and possibly 30-45 days could <br />be more appropriate. This timeframe would help in cases such as this one, and in larger cases. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty reiterated that if the paving isn’t completed until next year, the cost will <br />rise. He suggested that if the City is approached by parties that will be assessed, if the City gives <br />them the facts, possibly the residents would work with the City to get the project started sooner. <br /> <br />Director Ulrich pointed out that there is a 60-day waiting period for anyone in the city; not just <br />those being assessed. Council Member Marty reiterated the possibility of asking the Charter <br />Commission to review this. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick stated it is not the Charter Commission’s decision. The Council has the <br />responsibility to interpret the Code and suffer the consequences of its interpretati on. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney stated the Resolution should be corrected from County Road H2 to <br />Mounds View Drive. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Approve Resolution 5595 as amended, A Resolution <br />to Set the Date for a Public Hearing as August 27, 2001. <br /> <br /> Ayes - -- 5 Nays - -- 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Assistant to City Administrator Reed stated she needed to present two items that may be more <br />appropriate listed under Council Business. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney. To add items K. Consideration of Resolution 5593, <br />Authorizing Severance Pay for Larry Decheine and L. Consideration of Resolution 5394, <br />Authorizing Severance Pay for Michael Ulrich to the Agenda under Council Business. <br /> <br /> Ayes - -- 5 Nays - -- 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />K. Consideration of Resolution 5593, Approv ing Severance Pay for Larry <br />Decheine <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Reed stated she learned earlier that day that one of the Public <br />Works employees would be retiring after 31 years of service. This is the last Council meeting <br />prior to the employee’s final date of working for the City. His last day will be July 31. Assistant <br />to the City Administrator Reed summarized that Mr. Decheine is entitled to 100% of accrued <br />vacation time, estimated at 98.94 hours. This translates to $1,838.51. There were tw o options
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.