Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 13, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Council Member Quick added the comment that the City has the report and needs to pay for it. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To authorize payment of checks 105794, 105828, 105837, <br />105844. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty stated that if the check for Corporate Presentations was submitted in the <br />cable department for this year, it would appear it was approved. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty suggested that if Council Member Stigney had questions about the <br />presentation from Springsted that he contact them directly. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas pointed out that it would be inappropriat e for a Council Member to <br />call; it could present another bill. She asked that City Administrator Miller call Springsted and <br />ask Council Member Stigney’s questions as well as inquire about overtime charges. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty questioned check number 106253 to Kennedy & Graven in the amount <br />of $39,132. He was aware that information on the payment was not readily available, and <br />requested it be researched. He said he knew the bill would be paid but just wanted clarification. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre commented on check number 106285 to Nextel for a $1,500 phone bill. Mayor <br />Sonterre asked the Council to formulate a policy for cell phone usage. He requested City <br />Administrator Miller to look into creating a policy. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty commented that Nextel has the two -way radios, so it seems the cell <br />phone usage wouldn’t need to be high. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre also commented on a check to Brighton Veterinary Hospital and explained the <br />reason this invoice is paid is because they have a boarding facility and that is not allowed in <br />Mounds View. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Marty. To Approve Consent Agenda Item A. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney raised questions on item 6e - -- Conditional Acceptance of <br />Improvements, Walgreens Development. He stated he was concerned with the trailway along <br />County Highway 10. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated he had left a message for the County to seek <br />permission from them for signage. He said the County is looking into installing crosswalk signs <br />that would not be typical. Throughout the County, there is no signage utilized to call attention to <br />crosswalks at intersections. The intent is to install some type of signage. Staff has not spoken <br />with the dev eloper yet regarding signage on the other side of the access. However, Staff has