Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 27, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br /> Ayes – 2 (Sonterre, Quick) Nays – 2 (Stigney, Marty) Motion failed. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Sonterre. To Approve Item 6A, Just and Correct Claims. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney requested a friendly amendment to remove Check number 106412, (the <br />Ulrich party) from the approval. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick declined the friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Ayes – 3 Nays – 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br /> <br />With respect to check number 106471, Council Member Marty asked if this expense was for the <br />past winter. City Administrator Miller replied she would check and get back to Council. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick stated this was the typical way things had been done, and the best way to <br />handle this was to have a formal policy for these issues. With respect to the going away party, <br />this was typical, every employee who had left had going away parties, and the City had provided <br />some of the support for the food. Council Member Quick stated this was nothing new. He stated <br />they could discuss what they were going to do in the future and go from there. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney stated it was the amount that was bothering him, and he would not <br />agree to pay for this at this time. He stated he would not vote for it. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty. To Approve item 6A, but to refer the topic of discussion for going <br />away parties, for the Maintenance Department to develop a list of auto repair businesses and to <br />take the lowest bidder, and to look into travel expenses to a future work session. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty retracted his motion. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To reconsider Council Member Quick’s second motion. <br /> <br /> Ayes - 4 Nays – 0 Reconsidered motion carried. <br /> <br />With respect to Items 6G, H, and I, Council Member Marty stated on Item 6G he wanted a copy <br />of the performance evaluation. He also asked for the same thing on Item 6H. He stated with 15 <br />percent pay increase as acting Chief, that person would be making more than the Chief was <br />making and suggested the 15 percent increase be addressed. With respect to Item 6I, he stated he <br />did not see a problem with any of these, but wanted to see the performance review. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick inquired if that information was confidential. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs replied generally that type of information was not confidential. City <br />Administrator Miller stated it was not provided as part of a public document, but if the Council <br />Members wanted to see those, she would provide copies. <br />