Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 7B <br />Meeting Date: October 8, 2001 <br />Type of Business: CB <br />WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing; <br />CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution 5627, a Resolution <br />Approving a Development Review for an Expanded <br />Billboard on City-Owned Land, 2373 County Highway <br />10, and Discussion of Proposed Purchase Agreement <br />for an Expanded Easement <br />Date of Report: October 4, 2001 <br /> <br />Background: <br /> Chris McCarver, representing Clear Channel Outdoor, owner of the billboard located on <br />city-owned land on the north side of County Highway 10, is requesting approval of a <br />development review to permit an expansion of the billboard from 300 square feet to 672 <br />square feet. Clear Channel owns a permanent lease for the 40’ by 40’ square plot upon <br />which the sign is located. To expand the sign, an additional easement or lease area <br />would need to be negotiated. The property is the former Midland Videen land that the <br />City acquired through its land swap with TOLD Development Company. The property on <br />which the sign is located is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development. The applicant has <br />submitted color overhead and side-perspective renderings of the expanded billboard, <br />which are attached for the Councils review. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />According to the City’s recently adopted Sign Code, the billboard is considered a legal, <br />nonconforming sign. Section 1008.13, Subd. 1 of the Sign Code states the following: <br /> <br />“Structural alterations, enlargement or re-erection are permissible only where <br />such alterations would not increase the degree of the nonconformity of the sign.” <br /> <br />City staff, supported in opinion by the City Attorney, interprets this to indicate that the sign <br />can be enlarged because the degree of nonconformity remains unchanged with an <br />expansion. The nonconformity is based not on the size of the sign or its setback, but rather <br />its location. It is nonconforming ONLY because it is not located north of new Highway 10. <br />The zoning is proper and the size would be in compliance. (Billboards are only permitted in <br />a PF or PUD zoning district, up to 700 square feet, not to exceed 35 feet in height.) <br /> <br />As part of the expansion, Clear Channel proposes significant landscape improvements <br />around the site and would bury the electric service, thus allowing for the removal of a <br />utility pole. The expansion would include the construction of a rock and brick base to add <br />an aesthetic enhancement to the corridor, in a fashion similar to the base of the new <br />Walgreens sign and that of Wynnsong Cinema. <br />Purchase Agreement: