My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/10/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/10/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:26 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 10:48:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/8/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/8/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 24, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />Council Member Marty also indicated that the rate of pay was calculated based on the hourly rate <br />of $32.91. He then noted that the chief was due for a step increase prior to his departure and <br />questioned whether the Chief’s pay should have been increased. <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Reed indicated that the step increase would be contingent <br />upon the completion of the Chief’s performance review. She then indicated that the Chief’s last <br />day was only 4 days after his two-year anniversary and that did not leave time for the <br />performance review to take place. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty noted that, because the Chief’s anniversary date was prior to his leaving, <br />he questioned whether the City was calculating the severance properly. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas explained that Council would have needed to approve the step increase <br />before it became effective. She then noted that, since the performance review had not taken <br />place and Council had not approved a step increase for the Chief prior to his leaving, it would be <br />inappropriate to calculate the Chief’s severance based on the increased pay. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Thomas. To Approve Items A, B, C, E, and F of the Consent <br />Agenda as presented <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Marty) Motion carried. <br /> <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. Resolution 5622 Authorizing Abatement of Hazardous Building at 8217 Long <br />Lake Road – Jeremiah Anderson <br /> <br />Housing Inspector Jeremiah Anderson explained to Council that the property located at 8217 <br />Long Lake Road has been abandoned and noted there are numerous code violations. He then <br />explained that the current owner is in the process of selling the property and staff is concerned <br />that an unsuspecting buyer would attempt to inhabit the property before all the code violations <br />were remedied. He then respectfully requested that Council approve the Resolution authorizing <br />abatement to formally authorize correction of the code violations. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney questioned if the abatement would prohibit the nonresident owner from <br />finalizing the sale of the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson noted the City is willing to work with the property owner on the sale. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Sonterre. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 5622, a <br />Resolution Authorizing Abatement of Hazardous Building at 8217 Long Lake Road. <br /> <br />Lee Wolfgram, the attorney for the incarcerated property owner, addressed Council and <br />explained that his client is incarcerated and the other seller is in Arizona and has been very <br />difficult to work with. Mr. Wolfgram noted the Purchase Agreement was signed on July 15,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.