My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/11/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/11/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:16 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 11:06:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/26/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/26/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 13, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />Torri Johnson of 7730 Long Lake Road indicated she had come to the meeting to obtain <br />information concerning the subdivision. She indicated that the subdivision had been pending for <br />six months, she feels that this plan is the best one she has seen so far, and she thinks that it does <br />not negatively impact the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson expressed concern with the corner lot because it seems to be small and is on a busy <br />intersection that could cause traffic issues. She then commented that she wanted to bring the <br />corner lot up but said it is not a large enough issue to stop the subdivision. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre closed the public hearing at 10:40 p.m. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Marty. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 5641, a <br />Resolution Approving a Preliminary Plat for Gustafson’s Fifth Addition Major Subdivision. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick questioned whether, when a piece of property is subdivided, the park <br />dedication fee is calculated on the size of the entire parcel. <br /> <br />Planner Atkinson indicated it was not. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty reminded Mr. Gustafson that several years ago when Council Member <br />Marty had started running for office he had stopped and talked to him and he was cynical about <br />the City because the City had done nothing for him. He then told Mr. Gustafson it was good to <br />see him before Council again. <br /> <br />Mr. Gustafson thanked Council for its approval. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty thanked the Planning Commission for its hard work on the Gustafson <br />subdivision. <br /> <br />C. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 690, an Ordinance Amending <br />Chapter 1001.02 of the Municipal Code (Building Code) Relating to Work <br />Requiring a City License. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that Staff had identified a couple of types <br />of work that are not required to have a license within City Code and indicated that it is the City’s <br />intent to do what it can to protect residents by making sure that contractors doing work in the <br />City are licensed. He then indicated that the three types of work added to the Code are health and <br />safety issues that should be requiring some additional insurance. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas expressed concern with requiring a license for fire alarm installation <br />because it is an issue of electrical licensing which is dealt with by the state. She then commented <br />that the level of electrical wiring for fire alarms does not rise to the level of licensing required by
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.