My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2001/03/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Agenda Packets - 2001/03/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:45 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 11:39:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/5/2001
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/5/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
preferable to “spot” development. <br /> <br />Second, if it is the intent of the EDA to acquire and redevelop the Pak Building site (parcel “D”) at <br />some point, it might be better to do so in the near term. This is due to the fact that the building does <br />not currently have a tenant. As a result, relocation expenses could be significantly minimized. It is <br />my understanding that a realtor has been retained to lease the property. <br /> <br />Finally, a vacancy currently exists at the city’s rental property located at 7861 Groveland Road. If <br />the EDA would like to proceed in redeveloping the area, then staff would not re-lease the property. <br /> <br />Discussion Points: <br /> <br />1. What is the EDA’s perspective as it relates to redeveloping this area? <br /> <br />2. If the EDA would like to see this area redeveloped in the near term, what action should staff <br />take? Potential actions might include: <br /> <br />• Having a site specific plan for the area prepared, or attempting to have a site specific <br />redevelopment plan prepared in conjunction with the current Highway 10 planning <br />process (This would be an add-on to the RFP, therefore subject to additional charge) <br />• Examine the possibility of acquiring the Pak building. However, in the past they have <br />indicated an unwillingness to sell the building to developers and others that have <br />approached them. This is also the case with the sport shop / liquor store. <br /> <br />3. If the EDA would like to see property acquired and redeveloped in the near term, would the <br />EDA be willing to use eminent domain to acquire property for redevelopment purposes? Of <br />course, this authority is used only if a property owner is unwilling and/or unreasonable and <br />only after all others avenues have been exhausted. <br /> <br />4. What would the EDA like done regarding the rental property located at 7861 Groveland <br />Road? <br /> <br />Necessary Actions: <br /> <br />Provide direction to staff regarding the aforementioned discussion points. <br /> <br /> ______________________________________ <br />Aaron Parrish, Economic Development Coordinator <br />(763) 717-4029 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.