Laserfiche WebLink
subsequently incurred some demolition costs. If the city were interested in developing/selling the <br />property, I would suggest selling the property at a substantially reduced price given its limited <br />development potential. The development potential is constrained due to limited access (currently <br />right in, right out only off of County Road I), adjacent land uses, and the small size of the parcel <br />(approximately .8 acres). Since the parcel is within TIF District #1, the city could expect to <br />recuperate its acquisition costs plus generate additional revenue over the next twelve years. This is <br />possible through additional pooled increment resulting from the new construction. The following is <br />illustrative: <br /> <br />Suggested Sale Price $ 50,000 <br />Potential Additional Pooled Increment Generated $193,060* <br />Total Revenue Associated with Property $243,060 <br />Minus Initial Acquisition Cost $120,000 <br />Net Increase in Revenue Until District Decertification: $123,060 <br />*This is based on an assessed market value of $500,000 resulting in annual real estate taxes of $19,306 over a 10-year <br />period. <br /> <br />While the above is an approximation, over the remaining life of TIF District #1 it appears as if the city <br />would generate additional revenue even after selling the property at a reduced price. Of course, the <br />above is also predicated on the fact that additional TIF assistance would not be provided. After a <br />cursory review, it does not appear as if the potential project is a strong candidate for TIF assistance. <br /> The ongoing administrative and legal costs, limited capacity for the project to generate revenue, <br />and other issues associated with providing TIF assistance provide the basis for this interpretation. <br /> <br />Should the EDA determine that development should not occur on the parcel, staff would also <br />request direction about what to do with the property. Options could include leaving it undeveloped, <br />landscaping, and so on. <br /> <br />The second alternative being considered is across the street adjacent to the WIN Insurance Agency. <br />This parcel is highlighted as “alternative site” on the map above, and is part of the Silverview Estates <br />Planned Unit Development. The PUD allows for up to 5,000 square feet of office to be developed <br />on this particular parcel. This property is located within TIF District #2. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />1. Is the city interested in having this property developed? If not, what should be done? <br /> <br />2. If so, would the city be willing to sell the property to Mounds View Animal Hospital, and on <br />what terms? <br /> <br />Necessary Actions: <br /> <br />Provide direction on the use of 2625 Highway 10. <br /> <br /> ______________________________________ <br />Aaron Parrish, Economic Development Coordinator <br />(763) 717-4029 <br />