Laserfiche WebLink
From: Patrick Toth [patt@rcmnet.org] <br />Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 12:13 PM <br />To: Miller, Kathleen <br />Subject: Communication/television dept. opinions and suggestions <br />Kathleen, <br />Here's the brief listing you requested of my opinions and suggestions regarding the current situation with city communications and the <br />cable television department. As we will be discussing this and other areas of interest at the August 6th work session, feel to respond <br />and offer your thoughts before hand, if you wish. <br /> <br />Members of the M.V. Cable Committee will be attending the work session next Monday. Their knowledge and guidance has been an <br />indispensable asset over the years and it's my hope that their opinions and concerns will be a valued commodity at the discussion. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I feel that the city has four directions to take: <br /> <br /> The establishment of an administrative communication department, combining the city's communication and media <br />resources and services; television, website/email, phone system, press liaison. The creation of this department would <br />promote efficiency and streamline project management and decisions. Given the fact the communication continues to evolve <br />and play a major role in city business and with the citizens, the idea of forming a communication department within the city's <br />infrastructure is not only becoming very common with other municipalities, but is a wise, long-term solution for future goals and <br />productivity of Mounds View. There are three areas to examine closely with this option. 1. Budgetary matters and funding. <br />For example, would the current franchise fees that fund the cable department be pooled with a other sources to form a new <br />department budget or would they remain seperate? 2. Staffing. Would others be hired or kept on to assist (ex., part-time <br />television production assistants) the department head with his or her responsibilities? 3. Responsibilities. Combining <br />communication efforts under one roof would shift some current responsibilities to the new department. The possibility also <br />exists that some responsibilities would remain with staff but under a new supervisory role. Would this changes and alterations <br />to the staff infrastructure be accepted? <br /> <br /> The options below maintain that the cable department would remain as it is now, a seperate entity. <br />Continuation of a part-time television coordinator with production assistance. This option would be a continuation of <br />what exists in the cable television department as of now. It would remain functionary under the finance department with funding <br />from cable franchise fees. All responsibilities would remain the same and part-time/on-call, free-lance production staff would <br />continue to assist. <br /> <br />Establishment of a part-time television coordinator without production assistance. This alteration of the current position <br />would lower the overall responsibilities and functions within the department. The main responsibility of the part-time employee <br />would the recording, playback scheduling and monitoring of city meetings. Less emphasis would be cast on city and community <br />programming. Administrative duties would also be lessened. This individual would direct most of the city meetings, relying on <br />on-call help only when necessary. This would mainly be an evening position, keeping two to five hours a week open for light <br />administrative tasks. This option, minimizing the department as a whole, could be utilized for a short time while larger, future <br />objectives are developed. <br /> <br />Establishment of a full-time television coordinator without production assistance. This option is the opposite from the <br />one above. In establishing this, the television coordinator would move from a part-time to a full-time position, combining <br />administrative and all television production duties, thus eliminating the need for a night-time city meeting director (although an <br />on-call, free-lance assistant would be necessary). The coordinator would have to be flexible, working a.m. and p.m. hours as <br />well as alone. He or she would direct most, if not all of the city meetings. City productions and projects would also be given a