Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 27, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />then referenced the incorrect schedule of copper being used and inquired as to whether there <br />would be some sort of liability on the part of the contractor who installed the copper or perhaps <br />the City as the City should have inspected the work as part of the permit process. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin indicated he could not speak to potential liability on the part of the City or the <br />contractor involved in the installation of the pipe. <br /> <br />Ms. Hemenway indicated she feels let down by City because she had to pay for the costly repairs <br />and now other residents will not have to. Ms. Hemenway indicated she had other residents who <br />have had to make water service repairs sign the letter in support of her suggestion to have the <br />City provide for them in the program and allow them not to have to pay the fee for participation <br />in the program. <br /> <br />Ms. Fisher of 5901 Sunnyside Road indicated that the pipe shown earlier by Public Works <br />Director Ullrich was the pipe from her service. She indicated the pipe was hand dug when the <br />backhoe got closer to the pipe as there was another utility running next to the water pipe. Ms. <br />Fisher indicated this is a type of insurance policy for something you have no control over. For <br />instance, you can do preventive maintenance on other equipment in your home to avoid future <br />problems. There is no way to do preventive maintenance for your water service pipe. She is glad <br />the City is stepping in to help residents with these types of problems. When she and her husband <br />purchased the house in 1994 the seller indicated the pipe had been recently replaced and should <br />not need to be replaced again. It is obvious to her that since she has just replaced the pipe it will <br />need to be done again in the future and she is glad the City will be there to pick up the costs this <br />time. <br /> <br />Russ Anderson of 5159 Edgewood Drive told Council he has lived in his residence for 35 years <br />and has been worrying about when his water service would need to be replaced. When he got the <br />letter indicating the change to the ordinance and explaining the quarterly fee he was “one happy <br />guy.” He thanked the City for their willingness to assist residents. <br /> <br />David Jahnke of 8428 Eastwood Road indicated he did not see anybody protesting when the <br />ordinance was changed in 1986. He also indicated he is still concerned with how this program <br />will be administered. When does the program start? Is it retroactive to any resident currently <br />having a problem? <br /> <br />Marie Carlson of 5080 Eastwood Road indicated she has been at her residence without a water <br />service problem for 44 years and is very happy with the proposal by the City. <br /> <br />Rich Sontarre of 5060 Red Oak Drive inquired as to whether there would be a pre-existing <br />condition clause for participation in the program. He also inquired as to whether the coverage <br />would be retroactive to cover the period between when the proposed change was first addressed <br />by Council and when the change is finally made. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Ullrich indicated he does not believe there are currently any leaking water <br />services within the City. He then said that after the adoption of the ordinance and publication the