My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-2000 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
12-11-2000 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:39 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 12:31:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/11/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 27, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas indicated the reason for authorizing the study for the Community <br />Development Director position was to bring the points in line with the salary. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick indicated that the salary for a position is usually reviewed when someone <br />new is hired. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin indicated the Hay Study is a guideline for cities to follow. Not all salaries need <br />to fall exactly on the line just near the line. Mayor Coughlin indicated he did not put a lot of <br />stock in the Hay Study as it sets an arbitrary line for salaries based on averages not taking into <br />account individual situations. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated the purpose behind the study was to assign points to various <br />positions and the salary is based on those points assigned. Labor Relations Associates, Inc., has <br />recommended 588 points be assigned to the Community Development Director position and <br />Council Member Stigney believes the salary should be based on those points. He then said Mr. <br />Ericson is under a probationary period and the salary could be evaluated at the end of the <br />probationary period if Council desired. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin indicated he respected the professional judgment of City Administrator Miller <br />when it comes to pay for City employees. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty inquired as to whether this issue could be tabled to have a study <br />conducted by Labor Relations Associates, Inc., which would include the additional duties of Mr. <br />Ericson to see if the points total would be higher. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin suggested a vote on the motion to see where Council stood on the issue. <br /> <br />Vote on the Motion to Accept Option 3 setting the maximum annual salary at $68,045.40. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 2 (Coughlin/Quick) Nays – 3 (Marty/Stigney/Thomas) Motion failed. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomas: To Authorize Labor Relations Associates, Inc., to <br />Conduct a new Study on the Points for the Community Development Director Position to Include <br />the Additional duties of Mr. Ericson. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick inquired as to whether this was an entire study for all positions or just for <br />the position of Community Development Director adding the additional responsibilities. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty indicated he wanted to have Labor Relations Associates, Inc., re-evaluate <br />the points for the position taking into consideration the additional duties of Mr. Ericson. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick inquired if this study would be done in house or by Labor Relations <br />Associates, Inc. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the study would be done by Labor Relations Associates, Inc.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.