Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 27, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br /> <br /> Ayes – 3 (Coughlin/Marty/Quick) Nays – 2 (Stigney/Thomas). Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick moved the question. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Thomas) Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney recommended tabling the matter for further discussion. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin indicated a motion for approval had passed and a recommendation to table was <br />not in order. <br /> <br />E. Consideration of Resolution 5490, a Resolution Approving the Best Use of <br />the Property Between Sysco and the Existing Golf Course, is an Addition of <br />Nine Additional Holes of Golf. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller presented Resolution 5490 to Council and indicated the Resolution <br />had been amended to reflect the addition of a step requiring that an independent examination of <br />the project feasibility be conducted, to verify the numbers presented by the golf course staff; <br />should this analysis support staff’s findings the following steps will become null and void. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney took exception to the paragraph of the Resolution stating that Staff had <br />conducted a cost benefit analysis of adding nine additional golf holes, a clubhouse bar and <br />restaurant, an expanded range, and lighting the course at night and had determined that the <br />addition of the above would provide positive cash flow for the golf course. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 5490, a <br />Resolution Approving the Best Use of the Property Between Sysco and the Existing Golf Course, <br />is an Addition of Nine Additional Holes of Golf. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty thanked Staff for drafting the Resolution. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas noted she was present at the work session where this item was <br />discussed in an observatory role and inquired as to whether the Resolution was a matter of <br />expediency or if not, perhaps it would be more appropriate to act on step 2 of the Resolution <br />before actually adopting the Resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin explained that the Resolution is a requirement of applying for funding through <br />an organization called First Tee which is providing funding at a reduced interest rate to cities <br />building golf courses. The organization will fund 250 golf courses so the City needs to get in <br />line for funding. The purpose behind the addition of step 2 in the Resolution is to provide an out <br />for the City should it be determined expanding the golf course is not in the best interest of the <br />City. <br />