Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 23, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin told Assistant to the Administrator Reed she did a masterful job of addressing <br />his concerns and Council Member Stigney’s concerns. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Coughlin/Stigney. To Approve the Revised 2000 Affirmative Action Plan <br />as Presented. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated Assistant to the Administrator Reed had done a very good job <br />on the matter. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty was not present for the vote. <br /> <br />C. Discussion of Cable Franchise Applications <br /> <br />Coralee Wilson, Executive Director of North Suburban Communications Commission and CTV - <br />15 addressed the Council and told them CTV – 15 is entertaining applications for two new <br />franchises for cable. Most of the cities in the metropolitan area are looking at either two or three <br />applications from companies who want to provide cable television services. The incumbent in <br />the Mounds View area is AT & T Broadband. The incumbent in the Minneapolis area and south <br />is Time Warner. <br /> <br />The two applicants for the new franchise are Wide Open West which is based in Colorado and <br />Everest Connections which is based in St. Louis. Telecommunications companies wishing to use <br />the public right of way need to obtain a franchise from the City which enables them to use the <br />public right of way without having to get an easement from each property owner. Even though <br />there is only one cable provider in the area there has always been a nonexclusive cable franchise <br />agreement with the cable provider. The reason there has been only one up until this point is it <br />was deemed by other companies not to be cost effective to have to run all the cables and set up <br />systems in an area where there was already a cable provider only to have to share 50% of the <br />subscribers or possibly less than 50%. <br /> <br />The reason there are now companies willing to share the market is most telecommunications <br />companies are now able to provide cable, high-speed internet access and telephone service to <br />subscribers. Telecommunications companies have projected a possible sum of $150.00 per <br />household for various subscriber fees. <br /> <br />In 1984 Congress deregulated rates against the desires of local franchising authorities which <br />allowed rates to climb. In 1992 Congress again regulated the rates but there was a sunset on <br />regulation which ended last Fall. Consequently, rates increased. There are pros and cons to <br />competition in the telecommunications field. The competition should stabilize prices. It may not <br />lower the prices but it will keep the prices steady. The downside of competition is there will be <br />construction in the right-of-way and more green cable boxes in the right-of-way. Some residence <br />right-of-way areas may have a large green box depending on how the system is laid out. There