My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-2000 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
09-25-2000 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:09 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 12:58:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/25/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/25/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 11, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson explained that in conjunction with the platting of the properties <br />associated with the Walgreens Planned Unit Development, a survey was done on the Midland <br />Videen land, which revealed two sign easement areas. One easement area is a perpetual easement <br />originally dedicated to Naegle for the siting of a billboard and is improved accordingly. The <br />second easement area, located at the northeast corner of Highway 10 and the old alignment of <br />Edgewood Drive, was dedicated to the owners of the Bel Rae Ballroom, who had used the location <br />for their Bel Rae Ballroom sign. When the City purchased the Bel Rae Ballroom, it also acquired <br />the rights to this easement area. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson explained that the City is not currently using and has no future intent to <br />use this area for signage or for any other purpose. Because the easement overlaps the area <br />contemplated by the Walgreens PUD and because the area does not serve a public purpose, the <br />easement area should be vacated. Ordinance 668 is the document which would accomplish the <br />proposed vacation. The City Council approved the first reading of this ordinance at its meeting on <br />August 28, 2000 and Staff recommends the Council approve the second reading and adoption of <br />Ordinance 668. <br /> <br />There was no public input. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin closed the Public Hearing at 8:00 p.m. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomason. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Ordinance 668, an <br />Ordinance Vacating a Sign Easement No Longer Serving a Public Purpose. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty noted this ordinance called for a roll call vote and asked if it would need <br />to be unanimous for it to pass due to the absence of Council Member Quick. <br /> <br />City Attorney Long indicated a majority was needed so 3 affirmatives would allow it to pass. He <br />indicated the same was true for 10E. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL: Marty, Stigney, Thomason, Coughlin. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick was not present for the vote. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated for the record that this second reading and adoption were approved by the <br />unanimous vote of the Council. <br /> <br />B. Public Hearing, Resolution 5473 Authorizing a Levy Certification Property <br />Tax Rate Increase for Year 2001 Pursuant to State Statutes. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin opened the Public Hearing at 8:02 p.m. <br /> <br />There was no public input. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.