Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council September 11, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br /> <br />D. Consideration of Business License Approvals. <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Reed explained that in mid-May she mailed renewal letters to <br />all City of Mounds View businesses indicating that their business licenses would expire June 30, <br />2000 and asking that the appropriate applications, tax clearance forms, worker’s compensation <br />forms, fees and proof of insurance be submitted by June 16, 2000 in order to have her report <br />complete for the June 26, 2000 Council meeting. Several businesses missed this deadline. <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Reed stated she recently received completed license <br />applications from KFC and Dominos Pizza, the last of the unlicensed businesses in the City. <br />Neither of these businesses has any health, tax, utility or police violations that warrant denying <br />the license. In addition, commercial and residential kennel license applications have been <br />submitted by Sham-O-Jets Kennels and Geraldine Grosslein. Both applicants have paid the <br />required fee and neither has any police violations that warrant denying the requested kennel <br />licenses. <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Reed recommended approval of business licenses for KFC <br />and Dominos and kennel licenses for Sham-O-Jets Kennels and Geraldine Grosslein. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Approve Business Licenses for KFC and Dominos and <br />kennel licenses for Sham-O-Jets Kennels and Geraldine Grosslein as presented above. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick was not present for the vote. <br /> <br />E. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 663, an Ordinance Creating <br />Language to Administer and Regulate Tattoo and Body Piercing <br />Establishments within the City of Mounds View. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson reviewed that the City Council approved the first reading of <br />Ordinance 663 at its meeting on August 14, 2000. On August 28, 2000, the City Council <br />directed staff to review Anoka County’s tattoo ordinance and tabled action on the second <br />reading until September 11, 2000. He reported that staff spoke with Spencer Pierce, a manager <br />in the Community Health and Environmental Services Department of Anoka County. Mr. <br />Pierce indicated that their ordinance is twenty years old and is not as current as they would like <br />it to be. The Council was provided with a copy of Anoka County’s ordinance. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson explained Staff carefully reviewed Anoka County’s ordinance and <br />while different in its wording, the purpose and intent is similar to the extent pertaining to tattoos. <br />(The County has no ordinances concerning body piercing.) Staff would not recommend any <br />changes to Ordinance 663 based on the Anoka County ordinance. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that one change has been made to Ordinance 663 that differs <br />from the version approved for first reading. Section 515.10, Subd. 1a of the ordinance (Page 7) <br />has been revised to prohibit tattooing or piercing on minors altogether rather than with parental