Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL August 14, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page –12- <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated for the record that this first reading was approved by the <br />unanimous vote of the Council. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Waive the Reading and Introduce First Reading <br />of Ordinance 669, an Ordinance Authorizing Disposing by Sale of City-Owned Real <br />Property. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin requested a roll call vote to be called. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL: Marty, Thomason, Quick, Stigney, Coughlin <br /> <br /> Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated for the record that this first reading was approved by the <br />unanimous vote of the Council. <br /> <br />B. Public Hearing and First Reading (Introduction) of Ordinance 663, an <br />Ordinance Creating Language to Administer and Regulate Tattoo and Body Piercing <br />Establishments within the City of Mounds View. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin opened the Public Hearing at 8:10 p.m. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the Mounds View Municipal Code does not at <br />this time address tattoo or body piercing establishments. He stated that <br />Ordinance 653, which was adopted on February 14, 2000 to prohibit any tattoo <br />shops or body piercing establishments to be located in the City for a period of <br />six months, has been superseded by Ordinance 667, adopted August 7, 2000, which <br />extends the moratorium on such uses an additional three months. With the <br />adoption of Ordinance 667, such uses cannot locate in Mounds View until November <br />14, 2000, or until the effective date of this proposed Ordinance 663, whichever <br />occurs first. <br /> <br />He explained that the Council raised some questions at the work session on <br />August 7, 2000, regarding the licensing provisions, training and certification <br />of the specialists. Because of other development cases being processed, staff <br />has not had sufficient opportunity to explore these issues yet is confident that <br />such information will be made available prior to second reading and adoption. <br />If these questions are not fully addressed to the Council's satisfaction, second <br />reading can be put on hold until such time that those questions are addressed. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission has recommended adoption of Ordinance 663 as indicated <br />in Planning Commission Resolution 629-00, approved at their meeting on July 19, <br />2000. Staff recommends the Council hold the public hearing (and continue it to <br />August 28) and consider the first reading (introduction) of Ordinance 663. <br /> <br />There was no public input. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated the Public Hearing would be continued to the August 28, <br />2000 meeting. <br /> <br />