Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 14, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin asked for public input at this time. There being none, the public hearing was <br />closed at 7:26 p.m. <br /> <br />Bob Cunningham, representing TOLD Development, requested Council consideration of Item 20 <br />as contained in Resolution 5462 which contemplates the park dedication fees. He noted staff’s <br />calculation of 10% of $445,000 would be equal a park dedication fee of $44,500. He respectfully <br />requested that the Council waive this park dedication fees. Mr. Cunningham explained that over <br />time in negotiating with City Staff, they have agreed to additional costs beyond normal <br />development, the first of which was the inclusion of a trail to which they do not protest. That <br />totals 1,800 lineal feet of trail both on and off their property at an estimated cost of $36,000 to <br />$45,000. In addition, they have also agreed to pay the increased cost of the regional storm water <br />detention pond. He presented a diagram identifying the delineation of the storm water pond <br />needed for their project, and that of a regional storm water pond. He stated the cost for this <br />enlarged pond, the trail, and park dedication equals approximately $150,000 of additional costs <br />to get the development approved by the City. Mr. Cunningham stated that is why he would like <br />to respectfully request the Council to waive the park dedication fees. He stated TOLD <br />Development is also bearing the cost of the plat including Bronson, creating separate lots for the <br />Community Center, and the 66 feet for the Community Center lot, which is also a substantial <br />cost. <br /> <br />Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated this is a significant request and he is disappointed <br />it was not raised at the beginning of the public hearing process so comment could have been <br />made. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin reopened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. McCarty stated the park dedication fee is a very important part of the City’s business and, if <br />forgiven, he would suggest it be done on a trade-for-trade fair trade basis. He stated his <br />impression that other developers have been willing to provide a trail with PUD developments and <br />encouraged the Council to not establish a precedent. <br /> <br />William Kuether, 5302 St. Stephens Street, asked what he would have to do to “kill” this plan. <br />He stated he moved in a year ago and four other residents of St. Stephens Street have lived there <br />less than one year. <br /> <br />City Attorney Vose informed Mr. Kuether that offering public hearing input that he does not like <br />the plan is the first step to take. City Attorney Vose advised that he is not able to give other legal <br />advice to the public. <br /> <br />Mr. Kuether asked if there is any hope of stopping this project. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin explained this is the first Council meeting where official action has been <br />considered on this project. <br /> <br />Mr. Kuether stated he had asked the City Planner if the City could install shrubs to block the <br />view of Highway 10 from St. Stephens Street but it was indicated there was no money in the