My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2000 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
06-12-2000 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:28 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 2:00:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/12/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/12/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />process, and citizens would have the opportunity to provide their input with regard to this issue <br />in the very near future. <br /> <br />9. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR <br /> <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road stated the City has hired an individual to examine <br />expanding the golf course. He indicated the City was having difficulty paying for the golf course <br />as it was, and he did not believe they should invest more money into it because there were bonds <br />that must be paid off, and the City had a $200,000 float. He explained that no one was prepared <br />to guarantee that 18 holes would make any money, and although this had been stated with regard <br />to the 9 holes at the golf course, it did not occur. He stated he was very upset about this. <br /> <br />Mr. Jahnke stated he had a problem with regard to amending the Charter. He indicated he was <br />not certain why the City would desire to change the Charter. He explained that he had watched <br />the meeting during which some of the Council Members had indicated why they believed it was a <br />good idea, however, he did not personally believe it was a good idea. He advised that the City <br />has a Charter Commission to watch over government, and he had already made the Council <br />aware of what happened in the city of Cambridge. He indicated he has spoken with many <br />residents in this regard, and there might be some who are in favor of this, however, he has found <br />many who are opposed. He stated he would personally fight this proposal, as well as the <br />proposal to expand the golf course. <br /> <br />Ron Nelson, 2174 Oakwood Drive requested the Council consider installing a jump in the park <br />for the children who are currently utilizing the speed bumps on the side of the boulevard as a <br />jump for their bicycles, roller blades and skateboards. He stated he takes walks in this area for <br />his health, and has witnessed several incidents where these children have nearly been hit by the <br />speeding vehicles that travel on this roadway. He stated he understood that the road would be <br />widened, and inquired if the Council would consider this. He pointed out that this could assist in <br />preventing damage to private property as well. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated he would pass this recommendation on to the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission, and would personally write a note to the Chair of that Commission in this regard. <br />He indicated Mr. Nelson could contact staff liaison, Terri Blattenbauer, at the Community <br />Center, to learn how the matter is progressing. <br /> <br />Brad Jahnke, 8408 Eastwood Drive stated he attended a school picnic, at which the third grade <br />class was given a tour of the Public Works Department. He indicated he had gone into the <br />facility, and noticed that the City had purchased a brand new Caterpillar backhoe. He stated he <br />had desired to ask a few questions regarding the backhoe, however, it did not appear to be the <br />appropriate time, and he was informed that the City had been down this road before, and when <br />the City purchases equipment of this nature, they purchase the best so that it will last longer. He <br />stated he did not receive all of the information he desired at that time. <br /> <br />Mr. Jahnke stated in his understanding, the City traded in a backhoe for the new backhoe. He <br />inquired regarding the trade in amount on the old backhoe, and why the “Cadillac” of backhoes <br />was purchased for a City that does have a great need for it. He inquired if the Council voted on <br />this matter prior to the purchase of the backhoe.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.